摘要
朝鲜王朝立国之初,以编年体官修《高丽史》,几经努力不果。世宗年间改纪传体,编成139卷本《高丽史》,以塑造朝鲜王朝的正统性。《高丽史》对元东征日本历史的书写,强调高丽的自主性,刻画高丽对元朝需索的巧妙周旋,细致记录高丽所供给的粮草、人工等,凡背叛高丽、投身元朝的高丽人,都被称作"反人"而被列入《叛逆传》中,体现宗藩关系下高丽追求自主意识的努力。编写者在该书《忠烈王世家》与《金方庆传》中,塑造了两个类似的元东征日本历史的版本,高丽将领被视作左右战场胜负的关键,蒙古统帅的刚愎自用、一意孤行,加上"大风雨",最终酿成东征的失败。对照《元史》,《高丽史》对元东征日本的书写极为偏颇。因此,对涉及东亚三国的历史事件,一定要摆脱"一国史"的局限,而用"东亚史"的视角,方能趋近历史的真相。
After a failure of compiling an official annalistic history of Koryo, the Choson government in King Se-chong period eventually accomplished the compilation of a 139 volume Jizhuan( 纪传) style Koryo history. Entitled Koryo-sa, this work was considered a major effort to shape the legitimacy of the Choson dynasty. Concerning the Yuan eastern expeditions against Japan, this book emphasized the self-determination of Koryo and its skillful dealings with the Yuan, recorded Koryo's supply of food and labors during the war in details, and mentioned all people of Koryo background serving in the Yuan government as traitors. By the Annals of King Zhong-lie and the Biography of Kim Fangqin, Koryo-sa portrayed two Koryo generals as the heroes of the war, while the self-willed Mongolian commanders and the storms were told the factors responsible for the failure of the expeditions. Since this kind of description is obviously biased when the Chinese and Japanese historical books are equally examined, it is suggested that researchers need to take a broader perspective instead of a one nation point of view in the study of East Asian history.
出处
《古代文明》
CSSCI
2017年第4期111-122,共12页
The Journal of Ancient Civilizations
基金
国家社科基金项目"中韩(朝)古代史学之交流与比较研究"(项目批号:13BZS008)的阶段性成果
