摘要
在他国专属经济区内"随船护卫"可能导致沿岸国权利和船旗国管辖权的"对立冲突",《联合国海洋法公约》和部分国家实践在专属经济区制度上的一些不调和加大了这种对抗的可能性,随之而来的问题是"随船护卫"人员的法律地位及其豁免有无的判定。然而,目前还无特定的国际条约或习惯法规则对该问题进行规范,与之相关的发生在意大利和印度之间的"艾瑞克莱谢号案"目前也仍在国际司法机构的审理过程中。由此,考虑到海上运输繁荣导致"随船护卫"数量和规模逐年攀升的趋势,论述及解答前述问题极富意义。总体而言,在他国专属经济区内"随船护卫"特别是"随船护卫"导致刑事案件的情况下,船旗国管辖权和沿岸国管辖权并行存在,彼此不存在优先关系,但这并不影响"随船护卫"人员的属事豁免地位。
Adopting vessel protection detachment to protect merchant ships in other state＇s EEZ may lead to confrontations of jurisdiction and immunity between the coastal state and the flag state. The disagreement between some recent state practices and the United Nation＇s Convention on the Law of the Sea makes this situation more complicated. However,there are no specific international treaties or customary international law on this issue; the only related Enrica Lexie Case between Italy and India under the ITLOS is still pending. Nevertheless,taking the prosperity of marine transportation into consideration,it is still quite necessary to explore this piece of blank of international law.
出处
《中国海商法研究》
2017年第3期50-58,104,共10页
Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
关键词
“随船护卫”
管辖权分配
属事豁免
专属经济区
《联合国海洋法公约》
艾瑞克莱谢号案
vessel protection detachment
distribution of jurisdiction
functional immunity
EEZ
United Nation＇s Convention on the Law of the Sea
the Enrica Lexie Case
