期刊文献+

国际投资仲裁中的涉华案例研究——中国经验和完善建议 被引量:13

The Research on ISDS Cases Involvement with China——China's Experiences and Relevant Improvement Suggestions
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着中国成为双向投资大国,中国投资者起诉东道国和中国政府被诉的国际投资仲裁案件时有发生,并可能加速增长。对国际投资仲裁中的涉华案例进行研究后,我们认为应重新审视和评估中国在吸收外国投资和保护对外投资两方面的利益,建议今后在新签署或更新中外双边投资协定(BIT)时考虑如下问题:(1)对港澳投资者问题以及中外BIT是否延伸适用于港澳作出规定;(2)对新旧BIT之间的适用问题予以更多重视;(3)尽可能明确最惠国待遇条款仅限于适用于实体问题,以免仲裁庭扩大自由裁量权;(4)高度关注投资者—东道国争端解决机制,坚持单一BIT范本原则,将不可仲裁事项中纳入例外条款,适度强化中外BIT对东道国法的补充和纠正作用,相对缩小用尽行政复议程序的争端范围。 As China has become both as a host state and as a home state,international investment arbitration cases that Chinese investors sue host state governments and cases that the Chinese government is sued by foreign investors may accelerate dramatically in the coming years. After making the research on international investment arbitration cases involvement with China,we believe that China should reconsider and evaluate the interests of China in absorbing foreign investment and protecting outbound investment,and suggest that China should consider and improve the following aspects when it concludes or upgrades Chinese-foreign bilateral investment treaties( "BITs") with other states in the future:( 1) to make provisions on Hong Kong investors and Macao investors and to clarify whether Chinese-foreign BITs can be applied to Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Macao Special Administrative Region;(2) to pay more attention to the application of the previous and new BITs during the transition period;(3) to make it as clear as possible that the most-favored-nation(MFN) treatment provision is limited to substantive matters to prevent a tribunal abusing its discretion;(4) to highlight the importance of investor-state dispute settlement mechanism and China should adhere to a unified model BIT,adopt exceptional matters into the scope of nonarbitrated disputes,strengthen moderately complementary and corrective functions of Chinese-foreign BITs on domestic laws of host states,and relatively narrow the scope of disputes that must exhaust administrative reconsideration procedures of host states before they are submitted to international investment arbitrations.
作者 梁咏 Liang Yong
机构地区 复旦大学法学院
出处 《国际法研究》 2017年第5期98-116,共19页 Chinese Review of International Law
基金 作者主持的2014年上海市教育委员会科研创新项目<双边投资协定发展趋势与中国对策研究>(14ZS001) 2012年上海社科青年项目"欧债危机背景下中国与欧盟贸易摩擦及对策研究"(2012EFX) 参与的2010年国家社科项目<气候变化下中国海外能源投资法律保护>(10CFX099)的阶段性成果
关键词 投资者—国家争端解决 国际投资争端解决中心 双边投资协定 最惠国待遇 中国投资者 Investor-State Dispute Settlement ICSID BIT the Most-Favored-Nation Treatment Chinese Investors
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献66

  • 1Emilio Agustín Maffezini v.The Kingdom of Spain,ICSID Case No.ARB/97/7,Decision Jurisdiction,25January 2000.
  • 2Plama Consortium Limited v.Republic of Bulgaria,ICSID Case No.ARB/03/04,Decision on Jurisdiction,8February 2005.
  • 3Siemens A.G.v.The Argentine Republic,ICSID Case No.ARB/02/8,Decision on Jurisdiction,3August 2004.
  • 4Gas Natural SDG,S.A.v.Argentine Republic,ICSID Case No.ARB/03/10,Decision on Jurisdiction,17June 2005.
  • 5Suez,Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona,S.A.and Vivendi Universal,S.A.v.Argentine Republic,ICSID Case No.ARB/03/19,Decision on Jurisdiction,3August 2006.
  • 6Camuzzi International S.A.v.Argentine Republic,ICSID Case No.ARB/03/7,Decision on Jurisdiction,10June 2005.
  • 7National Grid v.The Argentine Republic,UNCITRAL(ad hoc),Decision on Jurisdiction,20June 2006.
  • 8AWG Group Ltd.v.The Argentine Republic,UNCITRAL,Decision on Jurisdiction,3August 2006.
  • 9Suez,Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona,S.A.and Interagua Servicios Integrales de Agua,S.A.v.Argentine Republic,ICSID Case No.ARB/03/17,Decision on Jurisdiction,16 May 2006.
  • 10Hochtief AG v.The Argentine Republic,ICSID Case No.ARB/07/31,Decision on Jurisdiction,24October 2011.

共引文献40

同被引文献121

引证文献13

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部