期刊文献+

舒肝解郁胶囊治疗抑郁障碍的成本-效用分析 被引量:6

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Shugan Jieyu Capsule in Treating Depression
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价舒肝解郁胶囊治疗抑郁障碍的经济性。方法构建为期1年的抑郁障碍决策树模型和采用成本-效用分析评价舒肝解郁胶囊治疗原发性抑郁障碍的经济性,采用单因素和概率敏感性分析结果的稳定性。结果 1年期间,西酞普兰的成本为2718.84元,帕罗西汀为3126.60元,舍曲林为3862.21元,舒肝解郁为4031.20元,氟西汀为4234.12元;西酞普兰获得的QALYs为0.7211,帕罗西汀为0.7032,舍曲林为0.7217,舒肝解郁胶囊为0.7138,氟西汀为0.7136。以2016年3倍人均GDP作为阈值,最终经济性的判断依次为西酞普兰、舍曲林、舒肝解郁、氟西汀、帕罗西汀;单因素敏感性分析不影响研究结论,概率敏感性分析影响研究结果判断。结论舒肝解郁胶囊的经济性优于氟西汀和帕罗西汀,值得指南和临床推广。 Objective To evaluate economy of Shugan Jieyu Capsule in the treatment of depression.Methods To construct 1 year decision tree model of depressive disorder and to evaluate the economy of Shuganjieyu capsule in the treatment of primary depressive disorder by cost-utility analysis.The one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to determine the stability of the basic analysis.Results The cost of Citalopram is 2718.84 yuan,Paroxetine is 3126.60 yuan,Sertraline is 3862.21 yuan,Shugan Jieyu capsule is 4031.20 yuan, Fluoxetine is 4234.12 yuan;Citalopram obtained 0.7211 QALYs,Paroxetine is 0.7032,Sertraline is 0.7217,Shugan Jieyu capsule is 0.7138,Fluoxetine is 0.7136.The one-way sensitivity analysis do not affect the conclusion of the study,and the probability of sensitivity is determined by the three-fold per capita GDP as the threshold,and the final economic judgment was Citalopram,Sertraline, Shugan Jieyu capsule,Fluoxetine and Paroxetine Analysis of the impact of research results to determine.Conclusion Economy of Shugan Jieyu capsule is better than fluoxetine and paroxetine,The safety of Shugan Jieyu capsule is less than four kinds of chemicals,Shugan Jieyu capsule is worthy of guidance and clinical application to promote.
出处 《中国药物经济学》 2017年第9期7-12,共6页 China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics
关键词 抑郁障碍 舒肝解郁胶囊 网状Meta分析 决策树模型 成本-效用分析 Depression Shugan Jieyu Capsule Network meta-analysis Decision Tree Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1景艳玲,王立钢,张桂敏.西酞普兰与氟西汀治疗老年抑郁症对照研究[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2005,5(6):459-460. 被引量:4
  • 2翟金国,赵靖平,陈晋东,刘庆海,张传芝,刘朝军.湘鲁两个医疗机构精神分裂症患者经济负担的调查[J].中华精神科杂志,2007,40(1):41-44. 被引量:12
  • 3方力群,杨子超.西酞普兰与氟西汀治疗卒中后抑郁的对照研究[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2007,41(1):73-74. 被引量:4
  • 4Murray CJ,Lopez AD.Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990--2020:Global burden of disease study.The Lancet,1997,349(9064):1498-1504.
  • 5Murray C J,Lopez AD.Global mortality,disability,and the contribution of risk factors:Global burden of disease study[J].The Lancet,1997,349(9063):1436-1442.
  • 6Murray CJ,Lopez AD.Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world:Global burden of disease study[J].The Lancet,1997,349(9062):1269-1276.
  • 7Murray C J,Lopez AD.Regional patterns of disability-free life expectancy and disability-adjusted life expectancy:Global burden of disease study[J].The Lancet,1997,349(9063):1347-1352.
  • 8Andiin-Sobocki P,Jonsson B,Wittchen HU,et al.Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe[J].Eur J Neurol,2005,12(Suppl 1):1-27.
  • 9American Psychological Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders[M].Washington:American Psychiattic Association,1994.
  • 10Tarricone R,Gerzeli S,Montanelli R,et al.Direct and indirect costs of schizophrenia in community psychiatric services in Italy.The GISIES study[J].Health Policy,2000,(51):1-18.

共引文献14

同被引文献88

引证文献6

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部