期刊文献+

认知语法视角下的构式搭配分析——以让步构式Just Because X Doesn't Mean Y为例 被引量:2

A Cognitive Grammar Perspective on Collostructional Analysis Taking the Study of the Concessive Construction ‘Just Because X Doesn't Mean Y'as a Case
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认知语法框架下的构式搭配分析通过参照一般认知能力描写情景编码的语义结构,并从认知加工的角度探究搭配的典型性和多样性,进而弥补认知构式语法在结果阐释阶段的不足。以让步构式Just Because X Doesn't Mean Y(JBX-DMY)为例,从侧显和视角两个维度对其代词共现词位进行阐释,并提出经验性和概念性理据的区分。 Collostructional Analysis under the framework of Cognitive Grammar illustrates scene-encoded semantic structures by referring to general cognitive abilities and investigates the typicality and diversity of collocations from the perspective of cognitive processing, thdies the explanatory defect of Cognitive Construction Grammar during interpretation process. The article takes the concessive construction ‘ Just Because X Doesn’ tMeanY’( JBX-DMY) as an example, explains its pronoun lexemes from two dimensions of cognitive construal, i. e.profiling and perspective,and distinguishes experiential and conceptual motivation.
出处 《金陵科技学院学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第3期67-71,共5页 Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 金陵科技学院博士科研启动基金项目(jit-b-201701) 金陵科技学院教育教改课题(JYJG2017-34) 江苏省社科应用研究精品工程外语类项目(16jsyw-58)
关键词 构式搭配分析 人知语法 侧显 视角Jut BECAUSE X Doesn’t Mean Y Collostructional Analysis Cognitive Grammar profiling perspective Just Be-cause X Doesnt Mean Y
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献50

  • 1张松松.认知诗学的新进展——兼评Joanna Gavins的《篇章世界理论导论》[J].当代外语研究,2010(11):58-60. 被引量:6
  • 2汪少华.通感·联想·认知[J].现代外语,2002,25(2):187-194. 被引量:64
  • 3陈坚林.大学英语教学新模式下计算机网络与外语课程的有机整合——对计算机“辅助”外语教学概念的生态学考察[J].外语电化教学,2006(6):3-10. 被引量:316
  • 4王守仁.中国外语教育发展研究(1949-2009)[M].上海:上海外浯教育出版社,2009.
  • 5胡加圣.基于范式转换的外语教育技术学学科构建研究[D].上海:上海外国语大学,2012.12(9):109-112.
  • 6Brdar, M. 2007. Metonymy in Grammar: Towards Motivating Extensions of Grammatical Categories and Con- structions [M]. Osijek: Faculty of Philosophy of Josip Juraj Strossmayer University.
  • 7Brdar,M. &R. Brdar-Szab6. 2009. The (non-)metonymic use of place names in English,German,Hungarian, and Croatian[A]. In K. Panther, L. Thornburg & A. Barcelona (eds.). Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar [C]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • 8Evans, V. 2012. Cognitive Linguistics [OL]. http://www, vyvevans, net/CogLingReview, pdf. aecessed 07/19/2014.
  • 9Evans,V.&M.Green.2014.张辉孙崇飞编.认知语言学导论[M].北京:世界图书出版公司.
  • 10Fauconnier, G. & M. Tumer. 1996. Blending as a central process in grammar [A]. In A. Goldberg (ed.). Con- ceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language [ C]. Standford: Cambridge University Press.

共引文献90

同被引文献33

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部