摘要
目的 :比较浮针疗法、火针疗法和电针疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎的临床疗效。方法 :收集肱骨外上髁炎患者66例,根据随机数字表法分为浮针疗法组、火针疗法组和电针疗法组各22例。比较三组患者治疗前后疼痛程度、Mayo肘关节功能评分及无痛握力测试(PFG)评分。结果 :治疗前三组VAS、Mayo肘关节功能及PFG评分差异无统计意义(P>0.05);治疗2个疗程后,三组VAS评分下降,而Mayo肘关节功能及PFG评分增加(P<0.05);浮针疗法组和火针疗法组VAS评分差异无统计意义,均低于电针疗法组(P<0.05);浮针疗法组Mayo肘关节功能评分和PFG评分均高于另外两组(P<0.05)。结论 :浮针疗法可有效缓解肱骨外上髁炎患者局部疼痛,恢复其前臂握力和肘关节功能。
Objective：To compare the clinical effects of superficial needle therapy,fire-needle therapy and electroacupuncture therapy for lateral epicondylitis.Methods：Sixty-six lateral epicondylitis patients were selected and randomly divided into a superficial needle group,a fire-needle group and an electroacupuncture group with 22 cases each.The pain degree,Mayo score and PFG score were compared before and after treatment.Results：There were no significant differences in VAS,Mayo and PFG scores in the three groups before treatment（P〈0.05）.The VAS scores were significantly decreased with the increase of Mayo and PFG scores in the three groups after two courses of treatment（P〈0.05）.There were no significant differences in VAS scores in both the superficial needle group and fire-needle group（P〈0.05） and The VAS scores in the superficial needle group and fire-needle group was lower than those in the electroacupuncture group（P〈0.05）.Mayo scores and PFG scores were higher in the superficial needle group than the other groups（P〈0.05）.Conclusion：Superficial needle therapy can relieve local pain and restore a good elbow function and grip strength of lateral epicondylitis patients.
作者
连爱谦
张伟
吴小宝
李奕修
LIAN Aiqian ZHANG Wei WU Xiaobao LI Yixiu(Department of Tramotology and Orthopedics, the No. 92 Hospital of PLA, Nanping 353000, Chin)
出处
《上海医药》
CAS
2017年第21期47-49,共3页
Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词
肱骨外上髁炎
浮针疗法
火针疗法
电针疗法
lateral epicondylitis
superficial needle therapy
fire-needle therapy
electroacupuncture therapy
