摘要
目的:对比CT和MRI诊断股骨头坏死的临床价值。方法:选取某院在2015年7月至2016年7月收治的100例股骨头坏死患者作为研究对象,将患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组50例。观察组患者采用MRI进行诊断,对照组患者采用CT进行诊断。对比2组患者的诊断准确阳性概率、分期诊断情况以及阳性征象检出概率。结果:观察组患者的诊断准确阳性概率、分期诊断情况以及阳性征象检出概率明显优于对照组,数据差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:MRI具有更好的软组织分辨力,诊断的效果更优,对患者产生的危害较小,值得在临床中借鉴、推广以及应用。
Objective To compare the clinical values of CT and MRI in the diagnosis of femoral head necrosis. Methods Totally 100 patients with femoral head necrosis admitted in the hospital from July 2015 to July 2016 were equally divided into an observation group and a control group according to the time of treatment. The patients in the observation group were diagnosed by MRI, while the control group was diagnosed by CT. The positive rates of positive diagnosis, staging diagnosis and detection probability of positive signs were compared between the two groups. Results The positive rates of diagnosis,staging diagnosis and detection of positive signs were significantly better than those of the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion MRI has better soft tissue resolution, better diagnosis effect, less harm to patients when compared with CT, and thus is worthy clinical reference, promotion and application.
出处
《医疗卫生装备》
CAS
2017年第10期73-75,共3页
Chinese Medical Equipment Journal
