期刊文献+

唐文治先生学术中的汉、宋之辨

Monsieur Tang Wenzhi's Arguments about the Han-and Song-Style Scholarship
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国传统学术有汉学、宋学之争,前者重考据,后者重义理,彼此各为营垒,水火不容。梁启超赞扬乾嘉学派,扬汉抑宋,影响极大。如何看待二者优劣?在近现代中国,宋学是否还有推动社会进步的价值?唐文治先生以"茹经"为堂号,乃近代经学的典范。本文通过考察先生一生治学、办学、论学的经历,希冀揭示其汉宋兼治的学术底蕴,创办无锡国学专修馆的经学引领,以及在特定历史背景下高扬宋学,希冀挽救世道人心,旋转乾坤的学者胸襟。 The Qing Confucians were wild about the Han-Song dichotomy as regards the traditional Chinese scholarship. They asserted that the Han-style scholarship was renowned for its exegetical exploration of Confucian classics and by contrast its counterpart in Song dynasties devoted itself to the illumination of the most profound principles buried in the classics. The two types of scholarship was fundamentally different from each other. The Qing scholars in the reigns of Qianlong and Jiaqing were self-styled inheritors of Han scholarship. They were highly proficient in the philologico-phonological studies,but meanwhile remaining hostile towards the Song scholarship. Tang Wenzhi lived in the twilight years of Qing. He named his study rujing,or Classics-Engorging Hall,revealing the truth that he liked very much the studies in Confucian classics. But on the other hand,Tang paid due attention to the Song scholarship,hoping that he could prepare a remedy for the declining public morals and scholarly work by the rehabilitation of the Song-style Learning of Way( Principle).
作者 彭林
出处 《史林》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期41-46,共6页 Historical Review
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"<仪礼>复原与当代日常礼仪重建"(项目号:14ZDB009)阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献8

  • 1赵尔巽.清史稿[M]上海:上海古籍出版社;上海:上海书店,19861520.
  • 2李慈铭.越缦堂读书记[M]上海:上海书店出版社,2000127.
  • 3梁启超.中国近三百年学术史[M]长沙:湖南人民出版社,2010187.
  • 4洪焕椿.定海黄以周的经学著作[A]杭州:浙江人民出版社,1983251.
  • 5上海图书馆.中国丛书综录[M]上海:上海古籍出版社,1986.
  • 6萧一山.清代学者生卒及著述表[M]北京:北平中华印书局,1931.
  • 7顾颉刚.清代著述考(稿本)[A]北京:中华书局,2010.
  • 8王逸明.定海黄式三黄以周年谱[A]北京:学苑出版社,2011.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部