摘要
学界和实务部门有关民事诉讼检察监督核心功能的观点尚存争议,未能厘清各种功能之间的关系,制度利用者对不同功能的过度追求易导致制度功能发生异化。民事诉讼法修改后,民事诉讼检察监督的核心功能仍为法律监督,并未转变为权利救济。在确有监督事由且有监督必要之情形下,权利救济是法律监督功能的自然延伸,因此也应重视权利救济的补充功能。民事诉讼检察监督的社会功能主要包括增强社会公众对司法公正的感受、缓解社会矛盾、维护司法公信力和司法权威、建构法治秩序等。社会转型背景下,民事诉讼检察监督需同时注重法理功能和社会功能。应在注重法理功能的基础上更加重视社会功能,进一步注重息诉等社会功能实现的路径和方法,同时须避免制度利用者过度追求非核心功能导致的功能异化。
The view on the core function of the civil procuratorial supervision is controversial.The relationship between various functions is not clarified.The different pursuits of institutional users can easily lead to functional alienation.After the modification of the civil procedure law,the core function of the civil procuratorial supervision is still legal supervision,not right remedy.In the case of supervision and the need for supervision,right remedy is a natural extension of legal supervision,so due attention should be paid to the supplementary function of right remedy.The social functions of the civil procuratorial supervision mainly include enhancing the sense of judicial justice,relieving social contradictions,upholding judicial credibility and judicial authority,constructing the rule of law,etc.Under the background of social transformation,the civil procuratorial supervision needs to pay attention to legal and social functions at the same time.It is important to pay more attention to social functions as well as legal function,pay attention to the paths and methods for realizing social functions,and avoid functional alienation caused by excessive pursuit of non-core functions.
作者
李旻
LI Min(Personnel Division of Political Department, The First Branch of the People＇s Procuratorate of Beijing Municipal, Beijing 100040, China)
出处
《北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2017年第6期137-141,共5页
Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition
关键词
民事诉讼检察监督
法理功能
社会功能
法律监督
权利救济
civil procuratorial supervision
legal function
social function
legal supervision
right remedy
