期刊文献+

标准化沟通模式在急性心肌梗死患者中的应用 被引量:13

Application of SBAR communication mode in the patients with acute myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨标准化沟通模式(SBAR沟通模式)在急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中的应用价值.方法 选取本院心内科收治的AMI患者94例,随机分为常规组和SBAR组,每组47例.常规组给予常规护理,SBAR组给予SBAR沟通模式.比较两组护理满意度和不良事件发生率.结果 SBAR组护理满意度为95.74%,高于常规组70.21%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).SBAR组不良事件总发生率为4.25%,常规组为25.53%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.42,P〈0.05).结论 SBAR沟通模式可有效提高护士病情观察质量和护理满意度,降低临床不良事件发生率,值得临床推广. Objective To explore the application value of the situation-background-assessment-recommendation(SBAR) communication mode in the patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods Ninety-four cases of AMI patients who were hospitalized in the department of cardiology in Wuxi No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were included and were randomly divided into the conventional group and the SBAR group. There were 47 cases in each group. The patients in the conventional group were given the routine care; the patient in the SBAR group was given the SBAR communication mode. The nursing satisfaction and the incidence of adverse events in the 2 groups were compared.Results The nursing satisfaction in the SBAR group was 95.74%, which was significantly higher compared to the conventional group (70.21%,P〈0.05). The total incidence of adverse events in the SBAR group was 4.25%; in the conventional group the incidence was 25.53%. The difference between the 2 group was significant (χ2=6.42,P〈0.05).Conclusions The SBAR communication model can effectively improve the quality of the nurses&39; disease observation and the nursing satisfaction and reduce the incidence of clinical adverse events, which was worth clinical promotion.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2017年第27期3468-3471,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 生活质量 急性心肌梗死 标准化沟通模式 护理满意度 Quality of life Acute myocardial infarction Situation-background-assessment-recommendation communication mode Nursing satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献70

  • 1谢苗生 于俊民 连铭峰 等.35例急性心肌梗死急诊分析[J].中国急救医学,1999,19(3):167-167.
  • 2何超.通过JCI评审提升医院科学管理水平[J].中华医院管理杂志,2007,23(9):609-611. 被引量:33
  • 3Riesenberg LA,Leitzsch J,Little BW.Systematic review of handoff mnemonics literature[J].Am J Med Qual,2009,24(3):196-204.
  • 4The Joint Commission.National patient safety goals,2006,critical accesshospital and hospital national patient safety goals[EB/OL].[2012-04-28].http://www.ed-qual.com/emergency_medici-ne_news/ed_news_2006_jca-ho_patient_safety_goals.htm.
  • 5Audrey R,Noel E.JCAHO National patient safety goals for2007[EB/OL].[2012-04-28].http://www.patientsafety.gov/TIPS/Docs/TIPS_JanFeb07.pdf.
  • 6Audrey R,Noel E.Joint Commission National patient safety goals for 2008[EB/OL].[2012-04-28].http://www.patientsafety.gov/TIPS/Docs/TIPS_JanFeb08.pdf.
  • 7Zimmermann PG.Cutting-edge discussions of management,policy and program issues in emergency care[J].J Emerg Nurs,2006,32(3):267-273.
  • 8Thomassy CS,McShea CS.Shifting gears:jump-start interdisciplinary pa-tient care[J].Nurs Manage,2001,32(5):40-44.
  • 9Ilan R,Lebaron CD,Christianson MK,et al.Handover patterns:an ob-servational study of critical care physicians[J].BMC Health Serv Res,2012,12(1):1-10.
  • 10Hohenhaus S,Powell S,Hohenhaus JT.Enhancing patient safety during hand-offs:standardized communication and teamwork using the‘SBAR'method[J].Am J Nurs,2006,106(8):72A-72B.

共引文献278

同被引文献125

引证文献13

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部