摘要
目的 探讨推拿疗法在婴幼儿喘息性疾病治疗中的临床意义.方法 选择婴幼儿喘息性疾病患儿100例,选择患儿及家长愿意配合推拿治疗的50例作为治疗组;另外选取患儿及家长不愿意配合推拿治疗,愿意配合家庭雾化治疗的50例作为对照组.两组患儿均采取综合治疗,治疗组患儿给予推拿治疗,对照组给予家庭雾化治疗,对两组治疗效果进行比较.结果 对照组喘息缓解时间为(5.6±1.36)d、1年内喘息复发次数为(2.35±1.13)次、1年内出现呼吸道感染次数为(2.96±1.22)次、1年内需要再住院次数为(0.85±0.58)次;而治疗组患儿喘息缓解时间为(5.82±1.44)d、1年内喘息复发次数为(2.31±1.09)次、1年内出现呼吸道感染次数为(2.89±1.19)次、1年内需要再住院次数为(0.86±0.51)次,两组差异均无统计学意义(t=0.573、0.417、0.523、0.872,均P>0.05).两组治疗前、治疗后1个月及治疗后6个月,肺功能达峰时间比、肺功能达峰容积比差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论 推拿治疗能达到与家庭雾化治疗一样的效果,方法简单、易行,无任何不良反应,值得临床推广.
Objective To study the clinical effect of massage therapy on infants and young children with asthmatic disease.Methods 100 infants and young children with asthmatic disease were selected.The children and parents who agreed to cooperate with massage therapy were enrolled as treatment group.The children and parents who were unwilling to cooperate with massage therapy,but willing to cooperate with home aerosol therapy were enrolled as control group,50 cases in each group.The two groups of children took comprehensive treatment measures,the treatment group was given massage therapy,the control group was given home aerosol therapy.The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared and analyzed.Results The respite time,recurrent frequency of wheezing within 1 year,respiratory infection occurred within 1 year,number of re-hospitalization within 1 year of the control group were (5.6 ± 1.36) d,(2.35 ± 1.13) times,(2.96 ± 1.22) times,(0.85 ± 0.58) times,which of the treatment group were (5.82 ± 1.44) d,(2.31 ± 1.09) times,(2.89 ± 1.19) times,(0.86 ± 0.51) times,the differences were not statistically significant between the two groups (t=0.573,0.417,0.523,0.872,all P 〉0.05).The peak time before treatment,1 month after treatment and 6 months after treatment,and the peak volume ratio before treatment,1 month after treatment and 6 months after treatment between the two groups had no statistically significant differences(all P 〉 0.05).Conclusion Massage therapy can achieve the same effect with the home aerosol therapy,the method is simple,easy,without any adverse reactions,it is worthy of clinical promotion.
出处
《中国基层医药》
CAS
2017年第23期3583-3586,共4页
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词
推拿
脊柱
雾化器和汽化器
哮喘
婴儿
Manipulation,spinal
Nebulizers and vaporizers
Asthma
Infant