期刊文献+

基于赋权逼近理想值排序法的左氧氟沙星预防用药利用评价 被引量:11

Drug use evaluation of levofloxacin prophylactic used in neonates based on weighted technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution method
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:利用药物利用评价(drug use evaluation,DUE)的赋权逼近理想值排序法(technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution,TOPSIS)进行左氧氟沙星的预防用药评价。方法:结合DUE建立评价标准,运用基于属性的层次模型(attribute hierarchical mode,AHM)赋权法计算评价指标的相对权重,并运用TOPSIS进行数据处理以评价各医嘱与完全合理医嘱的距离,计算合理医嘱的比例,以评价抗菌药物预防用药合理性。结果:64份医嘱中完全合理的医嘱占66%(C_i=1,42份),基本合理医嘱占23%(0.8>C_i>0.6,15份),不合理医嘱占11%(C_i<0.6,7份)。结论:运用基于DUE的加权AHM的TOPSIS法对左氧氟沙星预防用药进行合理性评价是合理可行的。武汉科技大学附属普仁医院在左氧氟沙星的预防用药基本合理,但仍需改进。 Objective: To use the weighted TOPSIS method(TOPSIS) for drug evaluation based on DUE of levofloxacin prophylactic used. Methods: In order to evaluate the rationality of prophylactic use of antibiotics, the evaluation indicators and evaluation criteria binding DUE was established, the relative weight of evaluation index by using attribute AHM weight method was calculated, the distance between medical records with perfectly logical records by the use of TOPSIS was evaluated, and the proportion of reasonable records was calculated. Results: Among the 64 medical records, there were 66% perfectly reasonable(C_i=1, 42 cases), 23% basically reasonable(1C_i0.8, 15 cases), and 11% unreasonable(C_i0.6,7 cases). Conclusion: By using the weighted TOPSIS method based on DUE to evaluate the rationality of levofloxacin prophylactic used is reasonable and feasible. Levofloxacin prophylactic used in most applications is basically reasonable in Puren Hospital of Wuhan University of Sciencc and Technology which still need to be continual improvement.
出处 《临床药物治疗杂志》 2017年第9期51-55,共5页 Clinical Medication Journal
关键词 基于属性的AHM赋权法 加权逼近理想值排序法 左氧氟沙星 预防用药 药物利用评价 based on the properties of the AHM weighting method TOPSIS levofloxacin prophylactic used drug use evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献64

  • 1姚文武,陆超英.加权TOPSIS法在医院临床科室综合评价中的运用[J].中国医院统计,2004,11(1):40-41. 被引量:20
  • 2刘继斌,曲成毅,王瑞花.基于属性AHM的Topsis综合评价及其应用[J].现代预防医学,2006,33(10):1862-1863. 被引量:47
  • 3蒋培余,王春生,王珍.应用TOPSIS法与综合法综合评价医院医疗质量[J].医学信息(西安上半月),2007,20(1):19-21. 被引量:5
  • 4罗丽妮.加权TOPSIS法与RSR法相结合在医院综合评价中的应用[J].中国医院统计,2006,13(4):348-351. 被引量:17
  • 5陈新谦,金有豫,汤光.新编药物学[M].第17版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:32-33.
  • 6陈新谦 金有豫 汤光.新编药物学[M]15版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.583.
  • 7Tribble DR, Conger NG, Fraser S, et al. Infection - associated clini- cal outcomes in hospitalized medical evacuees after traumatic injury : trauma infectious disease outcome study [ J ] . J Trauma, 2011,71 (1S) :S33 -42.
  • 8Taha JM, Saba MI, Brown JA. Missile injuries to the brain treated by simple wound closure : results of a protocol during the lebanese con- flict[ J]. Neuresurgery, 1991,29 ( 3 ) :380 - 383.
  • 9Eren S, Esme H, Sehitogullari A, et al. The risk factors and manage- ment of posttraumatic empyema in trauma patients [ J ]. Injury ,2008, 39 ( 1 ) :44 - 49.
  • 10Tade A0, Thanni L0, Ayoade BA. A study of the pattern, manage- ment and outcome of penetrating colon injuries in sagamu [ J ] . Niger J Clin Pract,2009,12(3) :284 -288.

共引文献112

同被引文献97

引证文献11

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部