期刊文献+

润肠通便方治疗肛肠手术后便秘临床疗效观察 被引量:6

Clinical Observation on the Effect of Runchang Tongfang Recipe on Postoperative Constipation of Anorectal Disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:研究润肠通便方治疗肛肠手术后便秘的临床疗效。方法:将60例肛肠手术后便秘患者按照随机数字法分为观察组与对照组各30例,观察组患者采用润肠通便方治疗,对照组患者采用聚乙醇电解质散剂治疗,观察比较两组患者的临床疗效及临床症状积分变化情况。结果:经过治疗,观察组患者总有效率为96.67%,对照组总有效率为70.00%,组间临床疗效比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者治疗后各项排便症状积分均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:润肠通便方治疗肛肠手术后便秘安全有效,值得临床推广应用。 Objective : To study the curative effect of Runchang Tongfang on postoperative constipation of anorectal surgery. Methods:Sixty patients with postoperative constipation were divided into observation group (30 cases) and control group (30 cases) according to random number method. The rats in the observation group were treated with laxative and the control group was given polyelectrolyte powder. The clinical curative effect and clinical symptom score of the two groups were observed. Results : The total effective rate was 96.67% in the observation group and 70.00 % in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P 〈0.05). The scores of defecation cases were lower in the observation group than those in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion: Runchang Tongfang is safe and effective in the treatment of constipation after anorectal surgery, it is worth of clinical promoting.
作者 任婷婷 王荣
出处 《亚太传统医药》 2017年第22期166-167,共2页 Asia-Pacific Traditional Medicine
关键词 肛肠手术 便秘 润肠通便方 Anorectal Surgery Constipation Runchang Tongfang Efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1Stein P, Weber M, Prtifer S, Schmid B, Schmitt E, Probst HC, Waisman A, Langguth P, Schild H, Rad- sak MP. Regulatory T cells and IL-10 independently counterregulate cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses induced by transcutaneous immunization. PLoS One 2011; 6:e27911 [PMID: 22114725].
  • 2Bongers ME, Benninga MA, Maurice-Stam H, Grootenhuis MA. Health-related quality of life in young adults with symptoms of constipation con- tinuing from childhood into adulthood. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009; 7:20 [PMID: 19254365 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-20].
  • 3Koloski NA, Jones M, Wai R, Gill RS, Byles J, Talley NJ. Impact of persistent constipation on health-related quality of life and mortality in older community-dwell- ing women. Am ] Gastroenterol 2013; 108:1152-1158 [PMID: 23670115 DOI: 10.1038/ajz.2013.137].
  • 4McMillan SC, Williams FA. Validity and reliability of the Constipation Assessment Scale. Cancer Nurs 1989; 12:183-188 [PMID: 2743302 DOI: 10.1097/000 02820-198906000-00012].
  • 5Broussard BS. The constipation assessment scale for pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1998; 27:297-301 [PMID: 9620822 DOI: 10.1111/ j.1552-6909.1998.tb02652.x].
  • 6Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify eval- uation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39:681-685 [PMID: 8646957 DOI: 10.1007/BF02056950].
  • 7Knowles CH, Eccersley AJ, Scott SM, Walker SM, Reeves B, Lunniss PJ. Linear discriminant analysis of symptoms in patients with chronic constipation: validation of a new scoring system (KESS). Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:1419-1426 [PMID: 11052520 DOI: 10.1007/BF02236639].
  • 8Frank L, Kleinman L, Farup C, Taylor L, Miner P. Psychometric validation of a constipation symptom assessment questionnaire. Scand ] Gastroenterol 1999; 34:870-877 [PMID: 10522604 DOI: 10.1080/00365529 9750025327].
  • 9Altomare DF, Spazzafumo L, Rinaldi M, Dodi G, Ghiselli R, Piloni V. Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10:84-88 [PMID: 17441968 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01262.x].
  • 10Rentz AM, Yu R, M~iller-Lissner S, Leyendecker P. Validation of the Bowel Function Index to detect clinically meaningful changes in opioid-induced constipation. J Med Econ 2009; 12:371-383 [PMID: 19912069 DOI: 10.3111/13696990903430481].

共引文献95

同被引文献69

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部