摘要
引用了三种标准对2015-2016CBA联赛主场效应进行了检验,并进一步在技术指标层面对主场效应进行了逐步判别分析,结果表明:(1)三种标准的检验结果一致表明:联赛总体具有明显的主场效应,但是这种主场效应在常规赛阶段非常明显,在季后赛阶段未能显现。(2)总体比赛主场效应主要体现在罚球次数FTA、助攻AST、失误TO、犯规F、盖帽BL和抢断STL等6项指标上,其判别作用依次减弱;常规赛的判别指标依次是罚中次数FT、助攻AST、失误TO、盖帽BL、犯规F和抢断STL;季后赛阶段因无主场效应特征而无法建立逐步判别函数。(3)胜场的主场效应主要体现在5项指标:助攻AST、失误TO、罚球次数FTA、盖帽BL和三分投中次数P3,其判别作用依次减弱;负场的主要依次体现在罚中次数FT、防守篮板DR、犯规F和三分命中率PP3等4项指标。
With three different standards and Stepwise Discriminant Analysis,the Home Advantage of 2015 - 2016 CBA seasonhas been done systematically,the results show that：（ 1）the tests from three different standards came to the same effect,thetotal season had a definite home advantage,especially in the regular seasons,but it had not in the playoffs. （ 2）there were 6variables can discriminate the home advantage in the total season：free throw attempt,assistant,turnover,foul,block shots,steal,their effects decline gradually;and there were 6 variables in the regular seasons：free throw made,assistant,turnover,block shots,foul,steal;no home advantage was found in the play - off season,so the discrimination function would not beenbuilt. （ 3）In the winning plays, 5 indicators can discriminate the home advantage clearly：assistant,turnover,free throw attempted,block shots,three - point made;4 indicators can discriminate the lost games：free throw made,defensive rebound,foul,three - point shot percent.
出处
《广州体育学院学报》
北大核心
2017年第6期84-87,共4页
Journal of Guangzhou Sport University
