摘要
民营企业家犯罪涉案财物处置过程中存在不当扩大查封、扣押、冻结的适用范围、"一扣到底"、未经定罪以行政处罚程序处置的问题。在查封、扣押、冻结财物时,应当及时审查财物是否与案件有关,贯彻比例原则;对于确实与案件无关的财物,财物所有人或其他权利人享有申请撤销查封、扣押、冻结财物的权利,侦查机关以外的司法机关(检察机关、审判机关)具有解除的权力;对于基于财产保全目的已被查封、扣押、冻结的与案件有关财物,财物所有人或其他权利人同样享有申请撤销的权利;未经一审生效判决,原则上不得处置涉案财物。
The process of disposing the property involved in criminal cases of the private entrepreneur shows major problems in the judicial practice in China： Firstly,the investigating authorities tend to excessively expand the scope of seizing,detaining and freezing of property involved. Secondly,the authorities do not take the initiative to terminate the process of seizing,detaining and freezing even if the measure is illegal. Thirdly,the authorities dispose of property in procedure of administrative punishment without conviction. In order to change this kind of phenomenon,in the case of seizing,detaining and freezing property,it shall be complied with the principle of proportionality and the authorities should examine whether the property is related to the case right promptly. In addition,property owners or other rights holders have the right to apply for revocation of seizing,detaining and freezing,and judicial organs other than investigative organs have the power to dissolve seizing,detaining and freezing. In principle,the property shall not be disposed before first instance judgment.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第12期170-181,共12页
Hebei Law Science
基金
国家社会科学基金项目<案外人权利救济的民事诉讼制度研究>(13BFX077)
关键词
民营企业家犯罪
涉案财物
查封
扣押
冻结
private enterprise crimes
property involved in criminal cases
close-down
seizure
freezing
