摘要
大陆制罐案是欧共体早期具有里程碑意义的案件,各种论著均多有论及,虽然国外法学界对此已有一些专门研究,但从法律方法论角度尚值得进一步探讨。本文利用原始资料复原该案件的经过,从管辖权、法律解释方法和相关市场界定三方面分析大陆制罐公司、欧共体委员会和欧洲法院对于法律事实的认定与法律适用的争论,评骘个中得失,认为欧洲法院对《欧洲经济共同体条约》第86条的解释,以差强人意的方式为企业并购控制寻求法律依据,但这种目的性解释在本质上就是一种符合"整体性"原则的权宜论证。
The Continental Can case is a milestone case in the early years of the EC, and is discussed in the va- rious literatures. Although there are some specialized researches in the foreign academic world, it is worthy of fur- ther in-depth research from the perspective of legal methodology. This article uses the original data to represent the case itself from three aspects, viz. the jurisdiction, the statutory interpretation method and the relevant market def- inition, to analysis the debate among the Continental Can Corporation, the European Commission and the Europe- an Court of Justice on the legal facts and the law applying. The interpretation to Article 86 of the European Eco- nomic Community Treaty by the European Court of Justice in unsatisfactory ways seeks legal basis for controlling M＆A, but such purpose interpretation is essentially a kind of expedient argument in line with the ＂integrity＂ doc- trine.
出处
《内蒙古师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2017年第5期97-107,120,共12页
Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金
北京市社会科学基金重大项目(15ZDA41)研究成果之一
关键词
大陆制罐案
法律解释方法
域外效力
相关市场界定
continental canning case
statutory interpretation method
antitrust extraterritoriality
relatedmarket definition
