期刊文献+

用腹腔镜胆囊切除术与小切口胆囊切除术治疗胆结石的效果对比 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :比较用腹腔镜胆囊切除术与小切口胆囊切除术治疗胆结石的效果。方法 :将阆中市人民医院在2015年11月至2016年11月期间收治的96例胆结石患者作为本研究的对象。回顾性分析这96例患者的临床资料,根据手术方法的不同将其分为观察组(n=56)和对照组(n=40)。采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术对观察组患者进行治疗,采用小切口胆囊切除术对对照组患者进行治疗,然后比较两组患者手术持续的时间、术中的出血量、术毕至肛门排气的时间、术毕至下床活动的时间、术后住院的时间、治疗的总费用及其术后并发症的发生率。结果 :与对照组患者相比,观察组患者术中的出血量更少,其手术持续的时间、术毕至肛门排气的时间、术毕至下床活动的时间和术后住院的时间均更短,其术后并发症的发生率更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组患者相比,观察组患者治疗的总费用更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 :与用小切口胆囊切除术治疗胆结石相比,用腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗该病的效果更好,能有效地减少患者术中的出血量,降低其术后并发症的发生率,缩短其术后恢复的时间。但用腹腔镜胆囊切除术对该病患者进行治疗的费用较高。 Objective: To compare laparoscopic cholecystectomy and small incision cholecystectomy for treatment of cholelithiasis. Methods: 96 patients with cholelithiasis treated in our hospital from November 2015 to November 2016 were randomly selected as the research object.Retrospectively study the clinical material of these patients.According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into experimental group(n=56)and control group(n=40). The experimeantal group of patients were treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the control group were treated with small incision cholecystectomy. Compare time of operation,bleeding loss volume, anal exhaust time, time of leaving bed, length of stay, total treatment expenses,and incidence of complications of 2 groups(P < 0.05). Results: Compare with control group, bleeding loss volume of experimental group is more less,time of operation, anal exhaust time, time of leaving bed, length of stay of experimental group are more shorter,incidence of complications is more lower(P <0.05). Compare with control group, total treatment expenses of experimental group is more higher(P<0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to small incision cholecystectomy in the treatment of cholelithiasis.Apply this therapy for cholelithiasis have effect of reduce bleeding loss volume and incidence of complications,shorten recovery time.But total treatment expenses of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is high.
作者 侯仕茂 郑勇
出处 《当代医药论丛》 2017年第20期95-97,共3页
关键词 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 小切口胆囊切除术 胆结石 laparoscopic cholecystectomy small incision cholecystectomy cholelithiasis
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献38

  • 1陈剑,韦军民.术中微切开胆道镜检查的可行性研究[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2005,11(6):372-374. 被引量:35
  • 2诸葛晋.小切口胆囊电切术720例临床分析[J].国际医药卫生导报,2006,12(20):35-36. 被引量:2
  • 3吴波,李方杰,任乐华,李先国,于玲玲.小切口电钩法切除胆囊374例临床分析[J].中国医药导报,2007,4(09S):135-135. 被引量:2
  • 4蔡得生.小切口胆囊切除与腹腔镜切除胆囊治疗胆结石比较研究[J].健康必读(中旬刊),2013,12(7):212-212.
  • 5叶轻衣,袁从容.小切口胆囊切除与腹腔镜切除胆囊治疗胆结石效果分析[J].求医问药(学术版),2012,10(12):30.
  • 6李锦良.腹腔镜切除胆囊与小切口胆囊切除治疗胆结石疗效探究[J].医学信息,2013,(9):225-226.
  • 7王上启.腹腔镜与小切口手术切除胆囊治疗胆结石的临床研究[J].健康大视野,2012,20(12):84-85.
  • 8Kenny R, Richardson J, McGlone ER, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus pre or post-operative ercp for common bile duct stones in patients undergoing eholecystectomy is there any difference? [J]. Int J Surg, 2014,12(9) :989-993.
  • 9Alexakis N, Connor S. Meta-analysis of one-vs, two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stones[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2012,14(4) :254-259.
  • 10Phillips EH, Toouli J, Pitt HA, et al. Treatment of com- mon bile duct stones discovered during cholecystectomy [J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2008,12(4) : 624-628.

共引文献123

同被引文献45

引证文献7

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部