期刊文献+

腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术的临床效果研究 被引量:1

Clinical Study of Laparoscopic Repair of Gastric Perforation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究应用腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术进行治疗的临床效果。方法选取96例胃穿孔患者按照入院登记薄将其分为对照组和观察组。给予对照组患者常规胃穿孔修补术治疗,观察组应用腹腔镜进行胃穿孔修补术联合术后服用半夏泻心汤辅助治疗。观察两组患者临床治疗情况。结果对照组治疗总有效率为75.0%,观察组治疗总有效率为95.8%;观察组患者手术出血量、术后排气时间、疼痛评分、康复进度、护理满意度等方面的数据均优于对照组。两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术联合半夏泻心汤辅助治疗,可减小手术所造成的创伤面,缓解患者疼痛感,缩短术后排气时间,促进其尽快康复。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic gastric perforation repair.Methods 96 patients with gastric perforation were selected and divided into control group and observation group according to the registration sheet.The patients in the control group received routine gastric perforation repair,and the observation group received laparoscopic gastric perforation repair combined with postoperative Banxia Xiexin decoction.The clinical treatment of the two groups was observed.Results The total effective rateof treatment group was 75.0%,the total efficiency of the observation group was 95.8% in the observation group; intraoperative bleeding,postoperative exhaust time,pain score,rehabilitation schedule,nursing satisfaction and other aspects of the data in observation group were better than the control group.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic gastric perforation repair combined with Banxia Xiexin decoction can reduce the wound surface,relieve the pain,shorten the postoperative exhaust time,and promote the rehabilitation as soon as possible.
作者 王永锋
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2017年第26期15-16,共2页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 腹腔镜 胃穿孔 修补术 laparoscopy gastric perforation repair
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献49

  • 1杨学林.老年胃溃疡患者穿孔修补术的临床疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(8):2150-2151. 被引量:22
  • 2Bertleff MJ,Lange JF. Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ul- cer:first choice A review of literature[J]. Surg Endosc,2010,24(6) : 1231-1239.
  • 3Lee SW,Whelan RL.Immunologic and oncologic implicati f lapa- roseopie surgery: what is the latest [ J ]. Clinics Colon Rectal Surg, 2006,19(1 ) :5-12.
  • 4Dutta S, Fullarton GM,Forshaw M J, et al. Persistent elevation of C-re- active protein following esophagogastric cancer resection as a predictor of postoperative surgical site infectious complications [ J ]. World J Surg,2011,35 (5) : 1017-1025.
  • 5Rau B,Kruger CM,Schilling MK. Proealcitonin:improved biochemical severity stratification and postoperative monitoring in severe abdominal inflammation and sepsis [ J ]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2004,289 ( 2 ) : 134-144.
  • 6Marik PE, Flemmer M. hnmunonutrition in the surgical patient [ J ]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2012,78 ( 3 ) : 336 -342.
  • 7Volk T, Schenk M , Voigt K, et al. Postoperative Epidural Anesthesia Preserves Lymp-hocyte, but Not Monocyte, Immune Function After Major Spine Surgery[J].Anesth Analg,2004,98 (4) : 1086-1092.
  • 8Sylla P, Nihalani A, Whelan RL. Mieroan-ay analysis of the differential effects of open and laparoscopic surgery on murine splenit T-cells [J]. Surgery,2006,139( 1 ) :92-103.
  • 9Nelson C J, Dykstra LA, Lysle DT. Morphineg immunologic and analge- sic effects:Compariou of time course [J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 1998, 437: 169-175.
  • 10王忠军.腹腔镜修补术与开腹修补术治疗胃穿孔疗效对比研究[J]实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2013(12).

共引文献130

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部