摘要
目的通过比较英国与中国EQ-5D-3L两种积分效用体系对成都市城镇居民生命质量健康效用值的评价,探讨两种体系对研究对象的适用性。方法用EQ-5D量表测量患者的生命质量,数据用SPSS 19.0进行统计分析。结果通过spearmen相关矩阵分析得出两种积分体系具有高度的相关性,所得健康指数的分布均为偏态分布,但是相较于英国的积分体系,中国积分体系模型拟合优度的R2、F值比英国高,且AIC值与BIC值低于英国。结论相比于英国的效用积分体系,我国的积分体系对研究人群健康效用评价有更好的适用性。
Objective By comparing the EQ -5D - 3L two integral utility systems of UK and China,to discuss the applicability of the two systems for Chengdu urban residents. Methods EQ -5 D questionnaire was used to measure the patients5 quality of life, SPSS 19. 0 was used to analyze the data. Results Spearnen correlation matrix analysis showed that the two kinds of integral system had a high degree of correlation,and both health indexes distribution were skewed distribution. However, China5 s integral system model of goodness of fit of the R2,F value was higher than that of the UK’s,and the value of AIC and BIC value was lower. Conclusion As compared with the UK’s integral system, China’ s integral system had better applicability for the study of the population life quality evaluation.
出处
《公共卫生与预防医学》
2017年第6期27-30,共4页
Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
基金
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20110181110038)
关键词
欧洲五维健康量表
积分效应体系
生命质量
European quality of life 5 - dimensions
Integral effective system
Quality of life
