期刊文献+

阿帕替尼及卡培他滨治疗晚期胃癌的疗效及不良反应观察 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察阿帕替尼及卡培他滨治疗三线及以上药物治疗失败的晚期胃癌患者的疗效及副反应,比较两者优劣性。方法2015年1月至2016年8月经病理确诊、既往未曾应用靶向药物及卡培他滨化疗、曾经过三线及患者的以上药物治疗失败的晚期胃癌患者68例,分别给予阿帕替尼片及卡培他滨片,直至疾病进展或连续评价6个周期,观察临床疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果阿帕替尼组疾病控制率(DCR)优于卡培他滨,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。阿帕替尼组和卡培他滨组患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为3.6个月和3.5个月,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。卡培他滨组白细胞减少及血小板减少比阿帕替尼组高;阿帕替尼组高血压、蛋白尿比卡培他滨组偏高,差异有统计学意义。结论阿帕替尼与卡培他滨在三线及以上药物治疗失败的晚期胃癌中,近期疗效阿帕替尼略优于卡培他滨,远期中位生存时间无明显差异,两者毒副反应各不相同,阿帕替尼主要为高血压、蛋白尿,而卡培他滨主要为骨髓抑制,但总体而言,毒副作用低,耐受性可,值得临床推广使用。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib compared with capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer patients after failure of third-line or beyond treatment. Methods From January 2015 to August 2016, 68 patients with pathologically confirmed advanced gastric cancer who failed of third line or beyond treatment were enrolled in the study. 35 patients were given apatinib for 500 mg/noce qd Po and the other 33 patients were given capecitabine tablets for 1250 mg/m2/time qd Po, until disease progression or continuous evaluation for 6 cycles.To evaluate the efficacy and safety of this two durgs. Results Two groups of disease control rate of DCR, there were significant differences ( apatinib than capecitabine, P〈0.05 ) . apatinib group and PFS capecitabine group were 3.6 months and 3.5 months, there was no statistically significant difference ( P〉0.05 ) . The leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in capecitabine group were higher than that in apatinib group, the hypertension and proteinuria of apatinib group were higher compared with capecitahine group, and they had statistical significance. Conclusion Apatinib and capecitabine in treatment of advanced gastric cancer with failed three lines and above drug treatment, curative effect of apatinib is better than that of capecitabine, there was significant difference. The long- term survival time does not exist significant difference, the adverse effect of different apatinib including hypertension, proteinuria, and capecitahine are mainly bone marrow suppression. But overall, the toxic and side effects are low and tolerable and it is worth popularizing in the clinic.
出处 《浙江临床医学》 2018年第1期50-52,共3页 Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
关键词 晚期胃癌 靶向治疗 阿帕替尼 卡培他滨 Stomach Neoplasms Targeted therapy Apatinib Capecitabine
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1Yeon Hee Park,Jae-Lyun Lee,Baek-Yeol Ryoo,Min-Hee Ryu,Sung Hyun Yang,Bong Seog Kim,Dong Bok Shin,Heung Moon Chang,Tae Won Kim,Young Jin Yuh,Yoon-Koo Kang. Capecitabine in combination with Oxaliplatin (XELOX) as a first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer[J] 2008,Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology(4):623~629
  • 2Emel Yaman,Aytug Uner,Ozlem Er,Ugur Coskun,Suleyman Buyukberber,Mustafa Dikilitas,Mevlude Polat,Deniz Yamac,Ali Osman Kaya,Ramazan Yildiz,Banu Ozturk,Mustafa Benekli. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (xelox) in the treatment of chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic colorectal cancer[J] 2007,Medical Oncology(4):431~435
  • 3Joseph Ciccolini,Cedric Mercier,Laetitia Dahan,Alexandre Evrard,Jean-Christophe Boyer,Karine Richard,Jean-Philippe Dales,Alain Durand,Gerard Milano,Jean-Fran?ois Seitz,Bruno Lacarelle. Toxic death-case after capecitabine + oxaliplatin (XELOX) administration: probable implication of dihydropyrimidine deshydrogenase deficiency[J] 2006,Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology(2):272~275
  • 4陈龙邦.抗肿瘤化疗与抗肿瘤免疫[J].医学研究生学报,2008,21(2):113-114. 被引量:19
  • 5石敏,李黎波,廖旺军,郑航,罗荣城.FOLFOX-4和XELOX方案一线治疗晚期胃癌的比较研究[J].南方医科大学学报,2008,28(8):1490-1491. 被引量:15
  • 6邬晓敏,任晓华,崔永安,左小东.奥沙利铂药物遗传学指标与胃肠癌化疗相关性的研究进展[J].医学研究生学报,2008,21(12):1332-1335. 被引量:5

共引文献12

同被引文献78

引证文献7

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部