期刊文献+

腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术与Lichtenstein疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝疗效比较 被引量:6

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较Lichtenstein疝修补术及腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)治疗腹股沟疝的疗效。方法2014年3月至2016年11月腹股沟疝患者78例,按照完全随机原则,分为2组,各39例。对照组采取Lichtenstein疝修补术,观察组实施TEP。观察两组手术情况、术后疼痛及并发症情况。结果观察组住院时间(5.03±1.21)d、下床活动时间(12.68±2.04)h、术后并发症发生概率513%,术后1d、3d、7d疼痛评分(4.34±1.08)分、(2.56±0.63)分、(1.21±0.73)分,比对照组明显更优(P〈0.05)。结论在腹股沟疝治疗方面,TEP相比Lichtenstein疝修补术效果更佳。 Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of Lichtenstein repair and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair ( TEP ) for inguinal hernia. Methods The 78 inguinal hernia patients ( 2014.3 - 2016.11 ) were selected as the objects in our hospital, according to completely random principles, were divided into two groups. The control group received Lichtenstein repair surgery, the observation group were performed TEP. The operation condition, postoperative pain and complications of the two groups were observed. Results Observation group of the hospital stay was ( 5.03 ± 1.21 ) d, the time of bedtime movement was ( 12.68 ± 2.04 ) h. The probability of occurrence of postoperative complications was 5.13%. One day after surgery, three days, seven days pain score- ( 4.34 ± 1.08 ) points, ( 2.56 ± 0.63 ) points, ( 1.21 ± 0.73 ) point, better than control group ( P〈0.05 ) . Conclusion In the treatment of inguinal hernia, TEP has better results compared to Lichtenstein repair surgery.
作者 陈海滨
出处 《浙江临床医学》 2018年第1期94-95,共2页 Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
关键词 腹股沟疝 Lichtenstein疝修补术 腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术 Inguinal hernia Lichtenstein repair Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献49

  • 1臧潞,李健文,毛志海,陆爱国,王明亮,董峰,马君俊,冯波,胡艳艳,郑民华.腹腔镜完全腹膜外与经腹腹膜前疝修补术临床对照分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2005,25(10):611-613. 被引量:63
  • 2李健文,郑民华,李华青,张辉,胡伟国,王明亮,陆爱国.腹腔镜全腹膜外补片植入术中补片固定与不固定的随机对照试验[J].中华普通外科杂志,2007,22(6):440-442. 被引量:54
  • 3Mckeman JB, Laws HL. Lapamscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach [J]. Surg Endosc, 1993, 7(1): 26-28.
  • 4Sanders DL, Waydia S. A systematic review of randomised control trials assessing mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair [J]. Hernia, 2014, 18 (2): 165-176.
  • 5Zhu X, Cao HY, Ma Y, et al. Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty versus open extraperitoneal approach for inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of outcomes of our current knowledge [J]. Surgeon, 2014, 12 (2): 94-105.
  • 6Zhang YY, Zhou HY, Chai YS, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38 (9): 2233-2240.
  • 7McCormack K, Wake BL, Fraser C, et al. Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparo--scopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review [J]. Hernia, 2005, 9 (2): 109-114.
  • 8Cobb WS, Kereher KW, Heniford BT. Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias [ J ]. Surg Clin North Am, 2005,85 (1): 91-103.
  • 9Ismail M, Garg M, Rajagupal M, Garg P. Impact of closed- suction drain in preperitoneal space on the incidence of seroma formation after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2009, 19 (3) : 263-266.
  • 10Menzo Emanuele Lo, Spector Seth A, Iglesias Alberto, et al. Management of recurrent inguinal hernias after total extraperitoneal (TEP) hemiorrhaphies [J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2009, 19 (4) : 475-478.

共引文献102

同被引文献54

引证文献6

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部