摘要
对犯罪参与问题中最为棘手的利用他人犯罪现象,区分制立法往往使用间接正犯理论加以处理。但考虑到我国单一制的犯罪参与立法现实、间接正犯理论存在的缺陷与我国刑事司法实践并无使用间接正犯概念弥补处罚漏洞的需要,宜对其作出否定性清理。同时,对于大陆法系国家刑法理论意图通过间接正犯概念解决的八种"支配型"利用他人犯罪的行为类型,运用单一制理论同样可以作出科学、合理且不逊色于区分制立法与理论的处理结果,实现罪刑均衡。
Principal and accomplice dividing system usually apply the indirect principal offender to the cases where someone uses others to commit a crime,which is also the thorniest cases in criminal participation.Considering the unitary principal offender system in China,the shortage of indirect principal offender and the fact that there is no requirement to use indirect principal offender to close the loophole in our country's criminal juridical practice,we suggest abolishing the concept of indirect principal offender.Besides,the application of unitary principal offender system can not only better solve problems of this kind,but also impose more appropriate punishment.
出处
《东南大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第6期89-100,共12页
Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"刑法修改与解释的限度关系论"(13YJA820017)的阶段性成果
