摘要
目的分析留守儿童与非留守儿童的耻感心理及其在同伴冲突情况下的应对方式差异。方法选取1 029名儿童进行问卷调查,包括儿童耻感问卷和同伴冲突应对方式问卷两部分。结果留守儿童行为耻感因子得分较非留守儿童低(P<0.001);在面临同伴冲突的情境时,选择幻想、攻击、退缩的应对方式较非留守儿童高(P<0.05);选取问题解决的应对方式较非留守儿童低(P<0.05)。结论留守儿童的耻感心理及其面对同伴冲突时采用的应对方式均与非留守儿童存在差异,有必要给予留守儿童一个好的成长环境,使其能形成正常的耻感心理,以及改善其同伴冲突时应对方式的选择。
Objectives To analyze the psychological sense of shame and coping style in peer conflict situation of left-behind children and non-left-behind children.Methods 1 029 children were selected to conduct a questionnaire survey.The questionnaire included two parts：children peer conflict coping style and the sense of shame.ResultsThe behavior shame factor of left-behind children was lower than that of non-left-behind children（P〈0.001）.In the face of peer conflict situation,left-behind children were more likely select fantasy,attack,retreat coping styles than non-left-behind children（P〈0.05）,while they were less likely select problem solving coping style than non-left-behind children（P〈0.05）.Conclusions Left-behind children＇s psychological shame and coping style in peer conflict situations are different from non-left-behind children,and it is necessary to provide left-behind children with a good growth environment,so that they can form a healthy sense of shame psychology,and improve peer conflict coping style selection.
出处
《中国社会医学杂志》
2017年第6期573-575,共3页
Chinese Journal of Social Medicine
基金
湖北省卫生厅科研一般项目(JX6B109)
十堰市科技局软科学研究项目(15R45)
关键词
留守儿童
耻感心理
同伴冲突
应对方式
Left-behind children
Psychological sense of shame
Peer conflict situation
Coping style
