期刊文献+

基于数据包络分析方法评估5类工作场所健康促进效率 被引量:2

Efficiency assessment of workplace health promotion based on data envelopment analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估5类、9个工作场所健康促进工作的效率。方法采取典型抽样,抽取5类、9个工作场所,并通过机构问卷、访谈和现场查阅文件的方法收集健康资源、健康制度和近1年无因病缺勤员工比例等数据,采用以投入为导向的SBM模型,分析工作场所健康促进工作效率。结果 9个工作场所的综合效率均数为0.644,其中规模效率均数为0.834,纯技术效率均数仅为0.772。其中,综合效率有效的工作场所仅有2个,纯技术效率有效的有3个,规模效率有效的有2个;有7个工作场所在健康资源和健康制度两方面均存在投入冗余。结论工作场所健康促进效率普遍不足。纯技术效率低下是工作场所健康促进效率不足的主要原因。 Objective To assess the health promotion efficiency of 5 kinds of workplaces, 9 worksites included. Methods 5 kinds of workplaces, including 9 worksites were selected through typical sampling. Data on health resources, health policy and the ratio of staff without absenteeism within 1 year were collected through institute questionnaire, interview and document check. Input-oriented Slack-Based Measure ( SBM ) was used to analyze the efficiency of workplace health promotion. Results Means of the technical efficiency, the pure technical efficiency and the scale efficiency of the 9 work- sites were 0. 644, 0. 772 and 0. 834 respectively; 2 scored 1 on the technical efficiency, 3 scored 1 on the pure technical efficiency, and 2 scored 1 on the scale efficiency; 7 workplaces had input redundancy in both health resources and health policy. Conclusion The efficiency of workplace health promotion is generally low. Pure technical insufficiency is the major cause of workplace health promotion insufficiency.
出处 《中国健康教育》 北大核心 2017年第11期992-994,1004,共4页 Chinese Journal of Health Education
关键词 工作场所健康促进效率 数据包络分析 投入冗余 Efficiency of workplace health promotion Data envelopment analysis Input redundancy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献86

共引文献43

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部