期刊文献+

带线锚钉在颈椎管狭窄单开门术中的应用及疗效分析 被引量:2

The Application and Curative Effect of Suture Anchors in the Stenosis Laminoplasty of Cervical Vertebra
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨带线锚钉在颈椎管狭窄单开门术中的应用及疗效。方法回顾性分析2014-01/2017-01在我院进行诊治的80例颈椎管狭窄患者的临床资料,所有患者均行颈椎后路单开门术,并在术中应用带线锚钉系统,记录患者术中情况,包括手术时间,术中出血量,并记录患者治疗效果与治疗前后的颈椎功能改变。结果患者平均手术时间为97.23±7.60 min,平均手术出血量为197.23±25.75 ml,治疗后80例患者中显效32例(40.00%),有效42例(52.50%),无效6例(7.50%),总有效率为92.50%。治疗后,颈椎功能明显改善,差异对比具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在颈椎管狭窄单开门术中引入带线锚钉辅助治疗方法,能够确保患者获得较高的治疗有效性,操作简单,快捷。 Objective To investigate the application and curative effect of suture anchors in the stenosis lamin- oplasty of cervical. Methods From January 2014 to January 2017, the clinical data of 80 patients with cervi- cal spinal stenosis diagnosed and treated in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent the stenosis laminoplasty of cervical and suture anchors in the operation. Recorded patients with surgery, in- cluding operation time, amount of bleeding, treatment effect and the function of cervical spine before and after treatment. Results The average surgery time was 97.23 ± 7.60 min, the average amount of bleeding in the operation was 197.23 ±25.75 ml. After treatment, in 80 cases, there were 32 cases (40.00%) with markedly effective, 42 cases (52. 50% ) with effective, 6 cases (7.50%) invalid. The total effective rate was 92.50%. After treatment, the cervical spine function improved significantly. The difference was statisti- cally significant ( P 〈 0. 05 ) Conclusion In the stenosis laminoplasty of cervical vertebra, the introduction of suture anchors can ensure the high treatment effectiveness for the patients, and the operation is easier and quick.
作者 张同华
出处 《职业卫生与病伤》 2017年第6期376-378,共3页 Occupational Health and Damage
关键词 颈椎管狭窄 单开门术 带线锚钉 cervical spinal stenosis laminoplasty suture anchors
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1沈茂,尚显文,张皓.颈椎后路椎管扩大成形术两种手术方法的疗效比较[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014(27):223-224. 被引量:1
  • 2吴广森,马远征,陈兴,靳安民.颈椎后路椎管扩大成形术的优劣初探[J].颈腰痛杂志,2005,26(3):228-229. 被引量:2
  • 3菅凤增,陈赞,凌锋.微型钛钉-钛板固定行颈椎管扩大成形术的初步临床报告[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(2):129-132. 被引量:30
  • 4Hirabayashi K,Watanabe K,Wakano K,et al. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopethy [J]. Spine, 1983,8(7):693.
  • 5] Odom GL, Finney W, WoodhaU B. Cervical disk lesions [J]. AmMed Assoc, 1958,166(1): 23-28.
  • 6Chiba K,Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, et al. Segmental motor paralysis after expansive open-door laminoptasty [j]. Spine,2002,27:2108- 2115.
  • 7Yoshida M,Tamaki T,Kawakami M,et al. Does reconstruction of posterior ligamentous complex with extensor musculature decrease axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty[J]. Spine,2002,27:1414- 1418.
  • 8Chiba K,Ogawa Y,Ishii K. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy:average 14-year follow-up study[J].Spine,2006,(26):2998-3005.doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000250307.78987.6b.
  • 9Ogawa Y,Toyama Y,Chiba K. Long-term results of expansive opendoor laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine[J].Journal of Neurosurgery-Spine,2004,(02):168-174.
  • 10Lee J Y,Hanks S E,Oxner W. Use of small anchors in cervical laminoplasty to maintain canal expansion:a technical note[J].Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques,2007,(01):33-35.

共引文献30

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部