摘要
行为人实施了实行行为之后,出于任意性(自动性)采取的中止行为本身符合了犯罪构成要件,可称之为犯罪性中止行为。该中止行为防止了犯罪结果的发生,同时又造成了新的法益损害,正是因为犯罪性中止行为同时具备有益性和损害性,导致了犯罪性中止行为定性的困难。如果一律认定该行为是犯罪行为、对其定罪量刑,则会忽视该中止行为的正当性;但是如果直接适用刑法第24条,则并不能充分评价犯罪性中止行为的结果无价值。因此,当犯罪性中止行为造成的损害是有效中止实行行为侵害结果发生的充分且必要条件,并且符合紧急避险条件时,可以认定为避险行为排除违法性,除此之外,其他情形应当按照所构成的相应犯罪定罪量刑。
After a perpetrator has implemented an act of conduct, the act of suspension taken for arbitrariness（automata） itself conforms to the elements of the crime and can be described as a criminal suspend act. This abortive act prevents the occurrence of the criminal result and at the same time it creates new legal damage, precisely because the criminal abortion has both beneficial and damaging effects, which leads to the qualitative difficulty of the criminal abortive act. If the act is always convicted and sentencing the crime, the legitimacy of the suspension will be ignored; however, the direct application of article 24 of the Criminal Code does not fully evaluate the value of the result of a criminal suspend act. Therefore, when the damage caused by the criminal suspend behavior is a sufficient and necessary condition for effectively suspending the execution of the act-infringement result and meets the emergency risk-avoidance conditions, it can be concluded that the avoidance of illegality is avoided for the avoidance of hedging behavior. In addition, in other cases, In accordance with the crime constituted by the corresponding conviction.
出处
《甘肃警察职业学院学报》
2017年第4期15-20,共6页
Journal of GANSU Police Vocational College
关键词
犯罪性中止行为
中止犯
犯罪构成要件
法益损害
紧急避险
criminal suspend behavior
suspense offender
elements of crime
legal interest damage
emergency risk. avoidance
