期刊文献+

重度尿道下裂一期手术与分期手术术后尿道并发症的比较 被引量:16

Comparison of urethral complications between one-stage and two-stage repair of severe hypospadias
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨运用一期手术及分期手术治疗重度尿道下裂(阴茎伸直后尿道开口位于阴茎根部、阴茎阴囊交接部及会阴部)手术效果的差异。方法 回顾性分析首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院泌尿外科2009年1月至2013年12月收治的病历资料完善的重度尿道下裂患儿765例的临床资料。按手术方法不同分为一期手术组(650例)和分期手术组(115例)。分析比较两组患儿手术年龄、尿道缺损长度及术后尿道瘘、尿道憩室、尿道狭窄发生率差异。结果 一期手术组650例平均初次手术年龄29月龄(7~130月龄),尿道缺损长度均值为4.01 cm(2.00~8.00 cm);分期手术组115例平均初次手术年龄34月龄(8~156月龄),尿道缺损长度均值为4.33 cm(3.00~9.00 cm),两组患儿手术年龄和尿道缺损长度差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。一期组术后总并发症发生率为30.5%(198/650),分期组为33.9%(39/115),组间比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.544,P〉0.05)。一期组术后尿道瘘发生率为16.0%(104/650),分期组为31.3%(36/115),组间比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=15.307,P〈0.05)。一期组术后尿道憩室发生率为14.0%(91/650),分期组为2.6%(3/115),组间比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=11.764,P〈0.05)。一期组术后尿道狭窄发生率为7.5%(49/650),分期组为4.3%(5/115),组间比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.516,P〉0.05)。结论 对于重度尿道下裂,一期手术和分期手术效果无明显差异,但是一期手术术后尿道瘘发生率较低,而分期手术术后尿道憩室发生率较低。 Objective To explore the difference of urethral complications between one-stage and two-stage repair of severe hypospadias.Methods A total of 765 patients underwent repairing of severe hypospadias from January 2009 to December 2013. They were divided into two groups of one-stage repair (Duckett & Duckett plus Duplay) (A, n=650) and two-stage repair (B, n=115). Two groups were compared with regards to age, length of urethral defect, rate of urethral fistula, urethral diverticulum and urethral stricture.Results In group A, the mean age was 29(7-130) months and the mean length of urethral defect 4.01(2.00-8.00) cm; in group B, the mean age was 34(8-156) months and mean length of urethral defect 4.33(3.00-9.00) cm. No difference of statistic significance existed in age, length of urethral defect (P〉0.05, P〉0.05) or rate of urethral complications [group A 30.5%(198/650) vs group B 33.9%(39/115), χ2=0.544, P〉0.05]. Difference of statistic significance existed in rate of urethral fistula [group A 16.0%(104/650), group B 31.3%(36/115), χ2=15.307, P〈0.05] and rate of urethral diverticulum [group A 14.0%(91/650) vs group B 2.6%(3/115), χ2=11.764, P〈0.05]. There was no difference of statistic significance in rate of urethral stricture [group A 7.5%(49/650) vs group B 4.3%(5/115), χ2=1.516, P〉0.05].Conclusions For overall complications of severe hypospadias, there is no difference of statistic significance between one-stage and two-stage repairing. However, the rate of urethral fistula is lower after one-stage repair and the rate of urethral diverticulum tends to be lower after two-stage repair.
出处 《中华小儿外科杂志》 CSCD 2017年第12期883-887,共5页 Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery
基金 教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20111107110007)
关键词 尿道下裂 尿道成形术 并发症 Hypospadias Urethroplasty Complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1Bracka A.The role of two-stage repair in modern hypospadiology.Indian J Urol,2008,24(2):210-218.
  • 2Duckett JW Jr.Transverse preputial island flap technique for repair of severe hypospadias.Urol Clin North Am,1980,7(2):423-430.
  • 3Patel RP,Shukla AR,Austin JC,et al.Modified tabularized transverse preputial island flap repair for severe hypospadias.BJU Int,2005,95 (6):901-904.
  • 4Demirbilek S,Kanmaz T,Aydin G,et al.Outcomes of onestage technique for proximal hypospadias repair.Urology,2001,58 (2):267-270.
  • 5Castonon M,Munoz E,Carrasco R,et al.Treatment of proximal hypospadias with a tabularized island flap urethroplasty and the onlay technique:a comparative study.J Ped Surg,2000,35(10):1453-1455.
  • 6Powell CR,Mcaleer I,Alagiri M,et al.Comparison of plaps versus grafts in proximal hypospadias surgery.J Urol,2000,163(4):1286-1288.
  • 7Aulagne MB,Harper L,de Napoli-Cocci S,et al.Long-term outcome of severe hypospadias.J Pediatr Urol,2010,10 (1):1-4.
  • 8Aoki K,Fujimoto K,Yoshida K,et al.One-stage repair of severe hypospadias using modified tabularized transverse preputial island flap with V-incision suture.J Pedia Urol,2008,4(6):438-441.
  • 9Johal NS,Nitkunan T,O'Malley K,et al.The two-stage repair for severe primary hypospadias.European Urol,2006,50(2):366-371.
  • 10de Mattos e Silva E,Gorduza DB,Catti M,et al.Outcome of severe hypospadias repair using three different techniques.J Pedia Urol,2009,5 (3):205-211.

共引文献22

同被引文献96

引证文献16

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部