摘要
目前涉及服务贸易开放的统计数据匮乏与测度的困难,使得建立合适的服务贸易政策评估框架及测度指标至关重要。文章基于OECD公布的STRI数据库,按照服务贸易政策的具体内容和分类,梳理出了"服务行业-政策领域-政策条款-具体措施"的四级评估框架,并从贸易提供方式(商业存在、自然人流动等)、市场准入和国民待遇等方面进行了分类和比较。在此基础上构建了"服务行业-政策领域-政策条款-具体措施"的四级STRI指标,以利于比较不同国家分行业、分政策层级的服务贸易限制程度,并分析其对经济的影响。按照文章构建的服务贸易政策评估框架及测度指标,对中美生产性服务贸易政策进行比较分析发现了较有启示的结论,美国在新兴服务行业重点限制自然人流动,在竞争领域存在较少障碍,对以商业存在的提供方式限制较少,重视使用国民待遇方面的限制等政策值得中国借鉴。
Nowadays, the lack of statistical data and the difficulties in measurement of service trade make it very important to establish an appropriate framework for service trade policy assessment and measurement indicators. Based on the database of STRI offered by OECD, according to the specific content of service trade policy and classification, this paper sorts out the four-level evaluation framework of ＂service industry-policy areas-policies terms- specific measures＂. It also classifies and compares the terms of trade （commercial existence, natural person flow, etc. ）, market access and national treatment. On this basis, STRI indicators of ＂service industry- policy areas- policies terms- specific measures＂ are constructed. It is beneficial to compare the degree of trade restrictions in different countries and to analyze its impact on the economy. In accordance with the service trade policy assessment framework and measurement indicators constructed in this paper, a comparison has been made between the productive service trade of China and the United States. The result shows that the United States focuses on limiting the flow of natural people in the emerging services industry and there are fewer barriers in the competition and commercial existence. The policies such as making use of national treatment are worth learning for China.
出处
《国际经贸探索》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期4-18,共15页
International Economics and Trade Research
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(14JZD020)
天津市教育委员会社会科学重大项目(2014ZD11)
关键词
服务贸易限制
STRI
生产性服务贸易
四级评估框架
restrictions on service trade
STRI
productive trade of service
the four-level evaluation framework
