期刊文献+

民航手工搬运作业人员肌肉骨骼损伤风险综合量化评价体系研究 被引量:1

Research of comprehensive quantitative evaluation system on risk of musculoskeletal damages in manual handling workers of civil aviation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨民航手工搬运作业人员肌肉骨骼损伤(MSDs)风险影响因素的评价指标体系的建立和权重确定。方法通过理论分析、专家调查和问卷调查等方式,分析影响民航手工搬运作业人员MSDs风险的多方面因素,以工作、生理、心理、环境和行李等5个因素为准则,构建了民航手工搬运作业人员MSDs风险评价指标体系,是基于序关系分析法(G1法)对作业人员肌肉骨骼损伤状况进行的评判,并确定了指标体系中各指标的权重,建立了民航手工搬运作业人员MSDs风险三级综合评价指标体系,将第三层子因素的MSDs风险分为五个等级进行分级量化,每名手工搬运作业人员MSDs指标分别对应不同的损伤程度。结果根据建立的综合评价指标体系编制民航手工搬运作业人员MSDs风险自测调查问卷,实现了民航手工搬运作业人员MSDs风险综合量化评价。结论由于民航手工搬运作业人员MSDs风险影响因素的多样性和复杂性,评价指标体系建立和权重确定较为困难。G1法为该作业群体MSDs风险评价提供了一种切实可行的思路。 Objective To discuss the comprehensive quantitative evaluation system on risk of musculoskeletal damages (MSDs) in manual handling workers of civil aviation and the determination of weights. Methods By theoretical analysis, expert survey and questionnaire, the influential factors for the risk of MSDs in manual handling workers of civil aviation were analyzed, five factors such as working load, physiological situation, psychological and luggage condition were taken as the basic criteria, and a comprehensive quantitative evaluation system for risk of MSDs in manual handling workers of civil aviation was established and the order relation analysis method (G1 method) was used to calculate the weights of indexes, thus, the three grade compre- hensive evaluation system for risk of MSDs was established. Then, the third level of WMSDs index were quantized by divided into five grades, the MSDs indices of the workers might respectively correspond to different degrees of MSDs. Results Through the statistical analysis of the questionnaires on risk of MSDs in manual handling workers of civil aviation based on the basis of com- prehensive quantitative evaluation system the comprehensive quantitative evaluation of MSDs risk in manual handling workers of civil aviation was realized. Conclusion The resuhs showed that the comprehensive quantitative evaluation system provides a practical way for the evaluation of MSDs risk in manual handling workers of civil aviation.
出处 《中国工业医学杂志》 CAS 2017年第6期421-424,共4页 Chinese Journal of Industrial Medicine
基金 "十二五"科技支撑项目(编号:2014BAI12B03)
关键词 手工搬运提举 肌肉骨骼损伤(MSDs) 风险综合量化评价体系 manual handling workers mnsculoskeletal damages (MSDs) comprehensive quantitative evaluation system for risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1贾连顺,陈德玉.腰椎椎间盘吸收综合征[J].中华骨科杂志,1989,9(2):85-87. 被引量:8
  • 2单士睿,朱瑞祥.改进的AHP法在评价农业机械化发展水平中的应用[J].中国农机化,2006(2):54-56. 被引量:10
  • 3周敏等.用层次分析法评测大学生就业竞争力.长江大学学报(自科版),2007,(6):140-142.
  • 4T L Satty. The Analytic Hierarchy Process [ M ]. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc, 1988.
  • 5OSHA, U. S. Department of Labor. Ergonomics for the Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders-Guidelines for Shipyards [ EB/OL]. OSHA 3341-03N, 2008. www. Osha. gov.
  • 6Neville Stanton, Alan Brookhuis, Eduardo Salas, et al. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods [M]. NewYork: CRC Press LLC. 2005.
  • 7Kristina Kemmlert. A method assigned for the identification of ergonomi~ hazards-PLIBEL [J]. Applied Ergonomics, 1995, 26 (3): 199-211.
  • 8Kai-Way Li, Yan-Wen Hsu, Chih-Hung Tsai. Applying the BRIEF survey in Taiwau's high-tech industries [ J ]. Interrtational Journal of the Computer, The Internet and Management, 2003, 11 (2) : 78-86.
  • 9Sunisa Chaiklieng, Pornnapa Suggaravetsiri. Ergonomics risk and neck shoulder back pain among dental professionals [ A ]. 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences [ C ]. Procedia anufacturing ( 2015 ) 4900-4905.
  • 10Romuald Rwamamara, Peter Simonsson. Self-compacting concrete use for construetion work environment sustainability [ J ]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2012, 18 (5) : 724-734.

共引文献67

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部