期刊文献+

美学区种植同期应用异种骨行引导骨再生术后愈合期间唇侧骨改建的临床研究 被引量:11

Early regenerated buccal bone remodeling following dental implant surgery with guided bone regeneration in the esthetic area using bone xenografts
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:研究美学区种植同期应用异种骨行引导骨再生(GBR)术后愈合期间的唇侧骨改建。方法:纳入2015年9月—2016年4月在上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔种植科行GBR同期种植体植入的上前牙23例。术前、手术当天及二期手术阶段拍摄锥形束CT(CBCT),记录牙龈厚度(>2 mm或≤2 mm)、骨质分类及使用的屏障膜。利用i CAT Vision数字化软件对种植体颈部肩台下2 mm(C)、体部中点(M)及根尖处(A)唇侧骨板进行测量,测量线与种植体长轴垂直。将纵切线向近中及远中各移动1 mm,得到新的纵切面,以同样方法测量唇侧骨板厚度并记录数值。在术前CBCT上测量牙槽嵴形态特征,记录牙槽嵴高度、倒凹深度及牙槽嵴宽度。采用SPSS 21.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果:种植体肩台下2 mm、体部中点及根尖处的平均骨吸收值分别为(0.70±0.59)mm、(0.85±0.72)mm和(0.55±0.51)mm,吸收率分别为23.07%、18.53%和12.97%。与植骨吸收相关的自变量中,相关分析表明,倒凹深度和年龄与植骨吸收量显著相关(P<0.05);将所有变量纳入多重线性回归并行逐步回归分析,仍具有统计学意义的变量为倒凹深度(P<0.05)。结论:美学区种植同期应用异种骨行GBR术后愈合期间唇侧会有一定程度的骨吸收。患者年龄及牙槽嵴倒凹对GBR术后愈合期内种植体唇侧骨板的改建具有一定影响。牙槽嵴倒凹越大,GBR术后愈合期内唇侧骨板吸收越少。 PURPOSE: To investigate early regenerated buccal bone remodeling following dental implant surgery with guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the esthetic area using bone xenografts. METHODS: From September 2015 to April 2016, 23 dental implants in the maxillary anterior region with simultaneous GBR using bone xenografts were included in the study. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) was acquired before operation, once the operation was finished and 6 months after surgery. Mucosal thickness (〉2 mm or ≤2 mm), types of bone quality and different membranes used were also identified. The buccal bone width perpendicular to implant long axis was taken 2 mm below the implant shoulder, midpoint and apical point of implant body at 3 intervals: the mesio-distal midpoint of the implant and 1mm mesial and distal to the the midpoint. Standardized measurements were taken to record alveolar height, width and undercut depth from preoperative CBCT scans. The data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 software package. RESULTS: Loss in width of augmented bone after 6 months of healing was (0.70±0.59) mm, (0.85±0.72) mm and (0.55±0.51) mm. Bone absorption rate was 23.07%, 18.53% and 12.97%, respectively. The variables "undercut" and "age" had significant influences on bone graft resorption (P〈0.05). Multiple linear stepwise regression analysis revealed that only undercut was the independent risk factor for bone resorption among all variables (P〈0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Early regenerated buccal bone remodeling occurs following dental implant surgery with GBR in the esthetic area. Undercut depth and patient age have a significant effect on graft resorption. Consequently, with deeper undercut, decreased resorption could be expected for regenerated buccal bone.
出处 《中国口腔颌面外科杂志》 CAS 2018年第1期29-33,共5页 China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
基金 2015年上海交通大学医工交叉基金(YG2015MS10)
关键词 引导骨再生 种植牙 唇侧骨板 美学区 锥形束CT Guided bone regeneration Dental implant Regenerated buccal bone Esthetic area CBCT
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献45

  • 1Isaksson S, Alberius P. Maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation with onlay bone-grafts and immediate implants [J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 1992, 20(1): 2-7.
  • 2Hollinger JO, Brekke J, Gruskin E, et aL Role of bone substitutes[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996,(324):55-65.
  • 3Wang S, Zhang Z, Xia L, et al. Systematic evaluation of a tissue- engineered bone for maxillary sinus augmentation in large animal canine model [J]. Bone, 2010, 46(1): 91-100.
  • 4Zhang W, Wang X, Wang S, et al. The use of injectable sonication-induced silk hydrogel for VEGF (165) and BMP-2 delivery for elevation of the maxillary sinus floor [J]. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(35): 9415-9424.
  • 5Block MS, Ducote CW, Mercante DE. Horizontal augmentation of thin maxillary ridge with bovine particulate xenograft is stable during 500 days of follow-up: preliminary results of 12 consecutive patients [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 70 (6): 1321-1330.
  • 6Barone A, Toti P, Piattelli A, et al. Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: a comparison between flapless and flapped procedure in a randomized clinical trial [J]. J Periodontol, 2014,85(1):14-23.
  • 7Sbordone C, Toti P, Guidetti F, et at. Volume changes of iliac crest autogenous bone grafts after vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation of atrophic maxillas and mandibles: a 6-year computerized tomographic follow-up [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 70(11): 2559-2565.
  • 8Cordaro L, Torsello F, Miuecio MT, ct al. Mandibular bone harvesting for alveolar reconstruction and implant placement: subjective and objective cross-sectional evaluation of donor and recipient site up to 4 years [J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2011,22 (11): 1320-1326.
  • 9Nissan J, Gross O, Mardinger O, et al. Post-traumatic implant-supported restoration of the anterior maxillary teeth using cancellous bone block allografts [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69(12): e513-518.
  • 10Wakimoto M, Matsumura T, Ueno T, et al. Bone quality and quantity of the anterior maxillary trabecular bone in dental implant sites [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23 (11): 1314- 1319.

共引文献11

同被引文献89

引证文献11

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部