期刊文献+

HER2阳性乳腺癌组织MICA/B高表达延长患者的无病生存期 被引量:4

High expression of MICA/B prolongs disease-free survival in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨人表皮生长因子受体2(humman epidermal growth factor receptor 2,HER2)阳性乳腺癌组织中主要组织相容性复合体-Ⅰ类链相关蛋白A和B(MHC class Ⅰ chain-related protein A/B,MICA/B)的表达水平与患者无病生存期(disease-free survival,DFS)的关系。方法:收集南方医科大学郑州人民医院2009年1月至2010年6月HER2阳性乳腺癌癌旁组织存档蜡块26例及乳腺癌蜡块100例,免疫组化染色检测癌旁组织及癌组织MICA/B的表达水平,采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析其与患者临床病理特征和DFS的关系。结果:MICA/B在癌旁组织中呈阴性(0/26);乳腺癌组织中MICA/B表达率为92%(92/100),其中高表达为65%(65/100);MICA/B在Ⅰ期的高表达率高于Ⅱ~Ⅲ期(77.55%vs 52.94%,P<0.05),在T1期的高表达率高于T2~T4期(75.00%vs 52.27%,P<0.05);ER、PR阳性(阳性细胞数≥1%)组MICA/B高表达率显著低于ER、PR阴性组(ER:52.38%vs74.14%;PR:51.35%vs 73.02%,均P<0.05)。MICA/B的表达与患者的临床分期、ER、PR的表达及肿瘤大小有关(均P<0.05),与绝经状态、组织学分级及淋巴结转移无关(均P>0.05)。无论靶向治疗组(90.6%vs 72.2%,P<0.05)或非靶向治疗组(78.4%vs58.8%,P<0.05)MICA/B高表达组6年DFS均显著高于低表达组。结论:HER2阳性乳腺癌组织中MICA/B高表达与患者的DFS密切相关,可作为患者预后的潜在预测指标。 Objective: To investigate the relationship between expression of MICA/B(MHC class Ⅰ chain-related protein A/B) and disease-free survival(DFS) of patients with HER2^+(human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) breast cancer tissue. Methods: Twenty six cases of corresponding para-cancerous tissue and 100 cases of HER2^+breast cancer tissue that preserved in wax at Zhengzhou People's Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University from January 2009 to June 2010 were collected for this study. Expression of MICA/B in these tissue samples was detected by immunohistochemistry; and the relationship between MICA/B expression with clinicopathologic features as well as DFS was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Results: The expression of MICA/B in adjacent paracancerous tissues was negative(0/26), however, it was highly positive in cancer tissues(92/100), and the percentage with high expression was 65%(65/100), the difference was significant(P〈0.05). High MICA/B expression rate in stage I was significantly higher than that in stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ(77.55% vs 52.94%,P〈0.05), and the high expression rate in stage T1 was also significantly higher than that in stage T2-T4(75.00% vs 52.27%,P〈0.05). High MICA/B expression rate in ER~+, PR~+group(with positive number ≥1%) was significantly lower than that in ER-, PR-group(ER:52.38% vs 74.14%,PR:51.35% vs 73.02%,all P〈0.05). MICA/B expression was correlated with clinical stages, the expression of ER, PR and tumor size(all P〈0.05), but not associated with menopausal status, histological grade and lymph node metastasis(all P〈0.05). Over-expression of MICA/B was closely associated with much better 6-year DFS rate in patients no matter with or without targeted therapy(the targeted group: 90.6% vs 72.2%; the untargeted group: 78.4% vs 58.8%, all P〈0.05). Conclusion: Over-expression of MICA/B in HER2^+breast cancer tissue is closely related to DFS, which may be served as a potential prognosis indicator for patients with HER2^+breast cancer.
出处 《中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第2期177-181,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Biotherapy
基金 郑州市科技局普通资助项目(郑科技[2014]2号)~~
关键词 MHC Ⅰ类链相关蛋白A/B 人表皮生长因子受体2 乳腺癌 无病生存期 MHC class I chain-related protein A/B(MICA/B) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) breast cancer disease-free survival (DFS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献43

  • 1Lanier LL. NKG2D Receptor and Its Ligands in Host Defense [J]. Cancer Immunol Res, 2015, 3(6): 575-582. DOI: 10. 1158/2326-6066. CIR-15-0098.
  • 2Fang L, Gong J, Wang Y, et al. MICA/B expression is inhibited by unfolded protein response and associated with poor prognosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma [ J]. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2014, 33: 76. DOI: 10. 1186/s13046-014-0076-7.
  • 3. Watson NF, Spendlove I, Madjd Z, et al. Expression of the stress-related MHC class I chain-related protein MICA is an indicator of good prognosis in eolorectal cancer patients[ J ]. Int J Cancer, 2006, 118(6): 1445-1452. DOI: 10. 1002/ijc. 21510.
  • 4Cho H, Chung JY, Kim S, et aL MICA/B and ULBP1 NKG2D ligands are independent predictors of good prognosis in cervical cancer[J]. BMC Cancer, 2014, 14: 957. DOI: 10. 1186/1471- 2407-14-957.
  • 5Reckamp KL. Advances in immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer[ J]. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol, 2015, 13 (12) : 847-853.
  • 6Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Akerley W, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer, version 1. 2015 [ J]. J Natl Compr Cane Netw, 2014, 12 (12) : 1738-1761.
  • 7Madjd Z, Spendlove I, Moss R, et al. Upregulation of MICA on high grade invasive operable breast carcinoma [ J ]. Cancer Immun, 2007, 7 : 17.
  • 8Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[ J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61 (2): 69-90. DOI: 10. 3322/eaae. 20107.
  • 9Gabrielson E. Worldwide trends in lung cancer pathology [ J ]. Respirology, 2006, 11 (5) : 533-538. DOI: 10. 1111/j. 1440- 1843. 2006. 00909. x.
  • 10Sellmann L, Fenchel K, Dempke WC, et al. Improved overall survival following tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer-the Holy Grail in cancer treatment? [J]. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2015, 4(3) : 223-7. DOI : 10. 3978/j. issn. 2218-6751. 2015.03.01.

共引文献27

同被引文献49

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部