期刊文献+

人工LARS韧带重建后交叉韧带的功能转归及生活质量 被引量:2

Functional outcome and quality of life of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with artificial LARS ligament
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨人工LARS韧带重建后交叉韧带(PCL)的功能转归及生活质量。方法采用人工LARS韧带重建PCL治疗34例单纯PCL损伤患者。采用Lysholm评分、Tegner评分、IKDC评分、改良Barthel指数对患者术前和术后3、6、9、12个月时患侧膝关节功能和生活质量进行评分。结果患者均获得随访,时间12~14个月。所有患者膝关节活动度良好,后抽屉试验阴性,术后疼痛明显好转,稳定性良好。术后3、6、9、12个月Lysholm、IKDC、Tegner、改良Barthel指数评分均较术前明显改善,各时间点与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论人工LARS韧带治疗PCL断裂近期疗效满意,且能提高患者日常生活能力,为治疗PCL损伤提供了新的移植物选择。 Objective To investigate the functional outcome and quality of life of posterior eruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction with ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS). Methods The 34 cases of PCL injuries were treated with artificial LARS ligament reconstruction. Lysholm score, Tegner score, the IKDC score, and the improved Bhrthel index were used to evaluate each patient of knee joint function and life quality at the preoperation,3,6,9 , 12 months postoperation,respectively. Results All patients were followed up for 12 - 14 months. All patients had good knee activity range, posterior drawer test was negative, postoperative pain improved significantly, stability was good. The scores of Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner and modified Barthel index at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months "after operation were sig- nificantly improved, compared with those before operation, there were significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative different time points ( P 〈 O. Ol ). Conclusions The artificial LARS ligament is effective in the treatment of PCL rupture and provides new: graft for 'the treatment of PCL injuries.
出处 《临床骨科杂志》 2018年第1期64-66,共3页 Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
关键词 关节镜检查 后交叉韧带损伤 人工LARS韧带 arthroscopy posterior cruciate ligagent injuries artificial LARS ligament
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献39

  • 1陈百成.人工韧带在重建膝关节交叉韧带中的应用[J].国外医学(骨科学分册),2005,26(2):75-77. 被引量:20
  • 2李箭.膝关节后交叉韧带重建手术[J].国外医学(骨科学分册),2005,26(2):78-80. 被引量:14
  • 3陶澄,何爱咏,王万春.膝关节后交叉韧带解剖研究及临床意义[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2007,25(2):176-178. 被引量:27
  • 4Majewski M, Susanne H, Klaus S. Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: A 10-year study. Knee, 2006, 13(3): 184-188.
  • 5Edgar CM, Zimmer S, Kakar S, et al. Prospective comparison of auto and allograft hamstring tendon constructs for ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2008, 466(9): 2238-2246.
  • 6Bernardino S. ACL prosthesis: any promise for the future? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18(6): 797-804.
  • 7Ventura A, Terzaghi C, Legnani C, et al. Synthetic grafts for anterior cruciate ligament rupture: 19-year outcome study. Knee, 2010, 17(2): 108-113.
  • 8Rollier JC, Besse JL, Lerat JL, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament revision: analysis and results from a series of 74 cases. Rev Chit Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 2007, 93(4): 344-350.
  • 9Barker JU, Drakos MC, Maak TG, et al. Effect of graft selection on the incidence of postoperative infection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med, 2010, 38(2): 281-286.
  • 10Scheffler SU, Schmidt T, Gangey I, et al. Fresh-frozen free-tendon allografts versus autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: delayed remodeling and inferior mechanical function during long- term healing in sheep. Arthroscopy, 2008, 24(4): 448-458.

共引文献39

同被引文献24

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部