摘要
目的探讨强脉冲光(IPL)治疗仪Lumenis One和Broad Band Light(BBL)治疗面部光老化的疗效和满意度。方法选取2015年1月至2016年12月于阳江市人民医院皮肤科治疗的90例面部光老化患者作为研究对象,随机分为对照组及观察组,各45例。观察组采用BBL治疗仪治疗,对照组采用Lumenis One治疗仪治疗,共治疗5次。比较两组患者治疗前(T1)、治疗第2次(T2)及治疗第5次(T3)后的光老化整体评分(GSP)评分,并采用4分法评定患者的皱纹、皮肤质地、色素斑、毛细血管扩张和皮肤紧致度改善情况,比较两组患者的满意度和视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分。结果两组患者T3时GSP评分均低于T1、T2时,且T2时GSP评分均低于T1时,两两比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);两组患者T1和T2、T3时GSP评分比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);两组患者T2和T3时的皱纹、皮肤质地、色素斑、毛细血管扩张和皮肤紧致度评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);在T3时期,两组患者的皱纹、皮肤质地、色素斑、毛细血管扩张和皮肤紧致度评分均较T2时具有明显改善(均P<0.05);两组患者的满意度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者的VAS评分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用强脉冲光治疗仪Lumenis One和BBL治疗面部光老化的疗效相似,患者对两种治疗方法的满意度相当,但BBL治疗面部光老化的舒适度高于Lumenis One。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and satisfaction of Lumenis One and BBL in the treatment of facial light aging.Mettods The patients who were treated with facial light aging in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2016 were included in 90 cases,randomly divided into control group and observation Group（45 cases）.The control group was treated with BBL treatment instrument,and the observation group was treated with Lumenis One treatment instrument,total treatment 5 times.before treatment（T1）,treatment of the second（T2） and treatment of the fifth（T3） after the GSP score,and assess the patient＇s wrinkles,skin texture,pigmentation,capillary dilation and skin tightness,patient satisfaction and VAS score.Results The GSP of T2 and T3 in both groups was statistically significant compared with T1;There was no significant difference in wrinkles,skin texture,pigment spots,telangiectasia and skin compactness between the two groups（P〈0.05）.During T3,the subjects of the two groups（P〈0.05）.The scores of wrinkles,skin texture,pigment spots,telangiectasia and skin tightness were significantly improved（P〈0.05）.There was no significant difference between the two groups（P〈0.05）.The VAS score of the two groups was lower than that of the observation group（P〈0.05）.The comparison was statistically significant.Conclusion The efficacy of Lumenis One and BBL in the treatment of facial light aging was similar,and the patient＇s satisfaction with the two treatments was comparable,but the comfort of BBL in the treatment of facial light was higher than of Lumenis One.
作者
陈燕
王卫亮
陶庭俊
CHEN Yan;WANG Wei-liang;TAO Ting-jun
出处
《中国药物经济学》
2018年第1期62-64,共3页
China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics
关键词
强脉冲光
光老化
皮肤衰老
Intense pulsed light
Photoaging
Skin aging
