摘要
在我国,鉴定人有法律规定的了解案情的权利,这也是一项备受争议的权利。一方面案情可以帮助鉴定人更好地做出判断;另一方面,案情可能会使鉴定人产生认知偏差。同时,在审判中心主义诉讼模式下,对鉴定意见的客观性和鉴定人的中立性要求提升。鉴定人了解案情是否对鉴定意见的客观性和鉴定人的中立性的造成影响?通过对专门问题与鉴定的分析来认识鉴定活动与诉讼的关系,把握鉴定人的角色定位。
In our country, the appraiser has the right to investigate cases. Meanwhile, such right is under widespread dispute. On the one hand, case facts can help the appraiser to make a better judgment; on the other hand, case facts may cause the appraiser forming cognitive bias. At the same time, in the judicial mode governed by the trial centralism, the objectivity of the appraiser＇s opinion and the neutrality of the appraiser are required to be improved. Would the appraiser＇s knowledge of the case impact the objectivity of the appraiser＇s opinion and the neutrality of the appraiser？ The role of appraiser can be better positioned based on the understanding of the relationship between appraisal activities and litigation on the basis of analysis on specific problems and appraisal investigation.
出处
《证据科学》
2017年第6期755-768,共14页
Evidence Science
关键词
鉴定人
物证鉴定
案情
合理分析
证据规则
Appraiser, Expert opinion on physical evidence, Case facts, Rationality analysis, Evidence rules
