期刊文献+

地铁颗粒物在区间隧道内运动的受力特征分析 被引量:2

Analysis of the forces acting on the subway particles moving along the underground tunnel
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了对地铁颗粒物进行数值模拟,讨论了不同粒径颗粒物的密度均值,重点分析了地铁颗粒物在区间隧道内运动的受力情况,计算和对比了各主要作用力。结果表明,地铁颗粒物的密度随粒径变化较大,采用平均值表示更为合适,其中PM1、PM2.5和PM10的密度均值分别为2.562 g/cm^3、3.766 g/cm^3和4.043 g/cm^3。由于地铁颗粒物独特的密度属性及区间隧道内特殊的流场环境,颗粒受力情况不能一概而论,当颗粒粒径为1μm时,主要作用力呈现明显的分化,仅需考虑Brownian力和曳力;当颗粒粒径为2.5μm时,重力占据了足够的份额而不能被忽略,需要考虑Brownian力、曳力和重力;当颗粒粒径为10μm时,Saffman力明显增大而不能被忽略,因此需要考虑Brownian力、曳力、重力和Saffman力。 The paper is devoted to providing a theoretical basis and a scientific evidence for the numerical simulation we have conducted on the subway particle pollution, with their mean density and sizes of such particles being in a range of diameters of 1 μm, 2. 5 μm and 10 μm on the basis of the elemental compositions, such as those of Fe, metallic elements and non-metallic elements. However, what we would like to stress is to do an emphatic discussion of the force condition of the subway particles in the tunnel in combination with their flowing field, the fluid density, the viscosity, temperature and the velocity gradient being included. And, in so doing, specific stress has been put on their calculation and detailed comparison. Thus, the final results of our calculation and discussion indicate that the density range of the subway particles in the case of Shanghai stands among 4 - 4. 9 g/cm3, which is slightly smaller than those of the so-far known foreign ones among 3.4 - 4. 7 g/cm3. Therefore, it turns out to be proper to choose the mean sizes as the representative ones, and, in turn, we prefer to take the mean densities for the subway particles as 1 p^m, 2. 5 μm and 10 μm, which are equal to 2. 562 g/cm3, 3. 766 g/cm3 and 4. 043 g/cm3, respectively. On the other hand, the forces acting on the particles are supposed to be classified into two categories, say, the secondary force and the main force. Of the two, the secondary force is supposed to include the b.asset force, the virtual mass force, the thermophoretic force, the pressure gradient force and the Magnus lift force, which can all be neglected, for in the flowing field environment of the tunnel and their density attribute of the subway particles, their main forces tend to vary with the difference of the particle diame- ters. When the diameter of such particles is just 1μm, their divergences can be obvious among the main forces. And, in comparison, the Brownian force and the drag force should be taken as rather large and as large as to the magnitude orders of 10 is and 10TM , whereas the size of the gravity and Saffman force should be taken to be rather small, say, at the level of 10~TM and 10-15, hence, their gravity and Saffman force can then be neglected. Thus, it is only the Brownian force and the drag force that should be taken into consideration. What is more, the diameter of 2. 5μm, the Brownian force and the drag force should be put into the range of the most critical forces. And, so, it should never be ignored or negligent if the ratio of gravity has been big enough as to 2.063%. Thus, it is only necessary to take into account the Brownian force, the drag force and the gravity in the aforementioned cases. Furthermore, when the diameter is 10 μm, the greatest'force, whose gravity is at the magnitude of 10-13. Drag force which has a proportion of 36. 36% is smaller than the gravity, while Brownian force is smaller than the former two. The strength of Saffman force has extremely transcended that in diameter 1 μm and 2. 5 μm, which cannot be ignored easily. Thus, all the main forces, including Brownian force, drag force, gravity should all be taken into consideration. Besides, Saffman force in the main flowing region and the force in the boundary layer should be considered separately and specifically according to the corresponding regions wherein the particles of 10 μm are situated.
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期310-314,共5页 Journal of Safety and Environment
关键词 环境工程学 地铁颗粒物 区间隧道 密度均值 受力情况 environmental engineering subway particles underground tunnel mean density values force condition
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献50

  • 1欧阳洁,李静海.模拟气固流化系统的数值方法[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,1999,7(4):335-345. 被引量:13
  • 2钟星灿.地铁空调负荷分析及估算[J].暖通空调,2006,36(6):72-76. 被引量:26
  • 3王建宇.高速铁路隧道空气动力学若干问题探讨[C]//2006中国高速铁路隧道国际技术交流会论文集.北京:铁道部工程设计鉴定中心,中铁西南科学研究院,2006:74-85.
  • 4中华人民共和国建设部.地铁设计规范(GB 50157-2003)[S].
  • 5F.Ampofo,G.Maidment,J.Missenden Underground railway environment in the UK Part 2:Investigation of heat load[J].Applied Thermal Engineering,2004,24:633-645.
  • 6SES,Principles and Applications,second ed.,Subway Environmental Design Handbook[M].vol.1,1976.3.
  • 7石礼安.地铁一号线工程[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1998.
  • 8李人宪,赵晶,张曙,彭宇明.高速列车风对附近人体的气动作用影响[J].中国铁道科学,2007,28(5):98-104. 被引量:34
  • 9Howe M S. The compression wave produced by high-speed train entering a tunnel[C]//Proceedings of the Royal Society. London, 1998: 1523-1534.
  • 10Baron A, Mossi M, Sibill S. The alleviation of the aerodynamic drag and wave effects of high-speed trains in very long tunnels[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2001, 89: 365-401.

共引文献66

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部