摘要
本权/占有范式只用于解决讨论取回所有物行为的可罚性问题,而不适于建构财产罪法益的整体话语系统。本权/占有范式与私力救济的允许限度、刑法判断的独立性问题既没有一一对应的关系,也无法互为根据,只是在具体的案件中存在结论上的部分重合。这一范式的适用前提,是盗窃罪以他人之物为对象,并通过刑法条文规定将他人之物由他人所有推及于他人占有。我国《刑法》第五章侵犯财产罪多以公私财物而非他人之物为对象,没有一概否定取回所有物行为成立财产罪,因而也没有扩张他人之物范围的必要。本权/占有范式在我国刑法语境中缺少相应的适用语境。无论是从我国刑法条文的规定还是司法实践看,取回所有物行为的可罚性取决于财产损害是否出现。而财产概念的法律与经济视角能够为财产损害的认定提供更为清晰和准确的标准。
The paradigm that distinguishes original property rights and possession applies only to determine whether taking back his/her own goods without others＇ permission constitutes theft or other crime against property. But it does not shed any lights on constructing the dogmatic structure that what should be the protected legal interests in crimes against property. The discussion of protected legal interest in crimes against property should not be confused with the other question such as the prohibition of private remedy or the independence of the judgment in criminal law. The analysis paradigm only partially coincides with outcomes in individual cases, without any proved one--to--one correspondence with issues listed above. The premise that this paradigm ap- plies is that the object of theft should be property owned by others, or based on Criminal Law, expanded to properties under others＇ possession. Chapter 5 PRC Criminal Law on crime against property all list public and private property, rather than property owned by others, as object of crime. This approach does not completely exclude the possibility that taking back one＇s own property may constitute crime against properties, nor provide any necessity to expand the scope of ＂other＇s property＂. The paradigm of original property rights/possession thus lacks applicability in the context of Chinese criminal law. From the perspective of written law, as well as judicial practice, whether taking back one＇s own property constitutes theft cannot be determined in a generalized manner. Rather, it shall be determined based on whether there any property lost exists. In comparison, the legal--economic perspective provides us with a clearer and more accurate criterion in determining property lost.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期84-100,共17页
Peking University Law Journal
基金
司法部2017年国家法治与法学理论中青年课题"防范与打击互联网新型财产犯罪"(项目编号:17SBF3017)的阶段性成果
关键词
本权/占有范式
取回所有物
私力救济
刑法独立性
他人之物
Paradigm of Property Rights/Possession
Taking Back Own Goods
Private Remedy
Independence of Criminal Law Judgement
The Other＇s Goods
