期刊文献+

探讨经肛管腔内超声造影诊断肛瘘的临床价值 被引量:8

Clinical value of hydrogen peroxide-enhanced transanal ultrasound in diagnosis of anal fistulas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经肛管腔内超声造影诊断肛瘘的临床价值。方法回顾性分析2016年1月-2017年8月于本院就诊的54例肛瘘患者的临床及影像学资料,以术中结果为金标准,对比经肛管腔内超声造影和肛周超声诊断肛瘘的价值。结果经肛管腔内超声造影和肛周超声对低位单纯性肛瘘、高位单纯性肛瘘、低位复杂性肛瘘、高位复杂性肛瘘的术前诊断符合率分别是100%vs 100%、100%vs 90%、100%vs 77.7%、78.6%vs 38.1%,与肛周超声相比,经肛管腔内超声造影有更高的准确率,特别是对于高位复杂性肛瘘。两者诊断内口、主瘘道和支瘘道的准确率分别是94.4%vs 96.3%、92.6%vs 66.7%、90.7%vs 59.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经肛管腔内超声造影检查诊断肛瘘更加可靠,可作为临床检查复杂性肛瘘的首选方法。 Objective To explore the clinical value of hydrogen peroxide-enhanced transanal ultrasound (HPUS) in diagnosis of anal fistulas. Methods Clinical and imaging data of 54 patients with anal fistula who were treated in our hospital from January 2016 to August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Accuracies of HPUS and color Doppler ultrasound (CDFI) for diagnosis of anal fistulas were evaluated using surgical finding as gold standard. Results The accuracy of HPUS was similar with CDFI in diagnosis of low simple anal fistulas (100% vs 100%), but higher for high simple anal fistula (100% vs 77.7%, P=-0.081) and lower complex fistula (100% vs 78,6%, P=0.082) without significant differences. Moreover, HPUS was superior to CDFI in diagnosis of high complex fistulas (90% vs 38.1%, P 〈 0.01), especially for location of internal opening (94.4% vs 66.7%, P=0.014), and secondary extension (92.6% vs 59.3%, P 〈 0.01). There was no significant difference in diagnosis of the primary fistula tract (96.3% vs 90.7%, P=0.083) between the two methods. Conclusion HPUS can be used as an optimal choice for the diagnosis of complex anal fistulas.
作者 姚蒙洁 刘志为 郭柏华 刘庆 胡茂飞 吕发勤 乔璐 卢灿荣 闻巍 吴盛正 YAO Mengjie, LIU Zhiwei, GUO Baihua, LIU Qing, HU Maofei, LYU Faqin, QIAO Lu, LU Canrong, WEN Wei, WU Shengzheng(Department of General Surgery, Hainan Branch of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Sanya 572013, Hainan Province, Chin)
出处 《解放军医学院学报》 CAS 2018年第3期212-214,共3页 Academic Journal of Chinese PLA Medical School
基金 三亚市医疗卫生科技创新项目(2017YW13)~~
关键词 肛瘘 经肛管腔内超声 超声造影 anal fistula transanal ultrasound contrast-enhanced ultrasound
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献35

  • 1蔡香然,孟悛非,张中伟.相位阵列线圈高分辨MRI显示肛管和肛周结构及其意义[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2005,23(6):570-575. 被引量:15
  • 2洪玉蓉,刘学明,张闻,莫国强,许俊,魏红权.超声造影在浅表淋巴结疾病鉴别诊断中的应用研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(11):849-852. 被引量:77
  • 3丁红,王文平,黄备建,李超伦,张晖,魏瑞雪.超声造影检测和诊断小肝癌的价值[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2007,14(1):28-31. 被引量:35
  • 4喻德洪 吴阶平 等.肛管直肠瘘(肛瘘).黄家驷外科学,第6版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.1170.
  • 5Holzer B, Rosen H R, Urban M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of perianal fistulas: predictive value for Parks classification and identification of the internal opening [J].Colorect Dis,2000,2(6) :340-345.
  • 6杜如昱,王杉,王建平,等.结肠与直肠外科学[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:261-262.
  • 7Al-khawari H A, Gupta R, Sinan T S, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of perianal fistulas[J].Med Princ Pract,2005,14(1) :46-52.
  • 8Graf D, Aeberhard P. Imaging of perianal and perirectal abscesses and fistulae using intraluminal ultrasound diagnosis[J]. Swiss Surg, 1995, 6(4): 294-297.
  • 9Hussain SM, Stoker J, Schouten WR, et al. Fistula in ano: endoanal sonography venus endoanal MR imaging in classification[J]. Radiology, 1996, 200(2): 475-481.
  • 10Ratto C, Gentile E, Merico M, et al. How can the assessment of fistula-in-ano be improved[J]? Dis Colon Rectum, 2000, 43(10): 1375-1382.

共引文献120

同被引文献87

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部