期刊文献+

公立医院绩效评价现况 被引量:4

Status Quo and Problems of Performance Evaluation in Public Hospitals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公立医院绩效评价是最重要的医院管理任务之一,是提升医院服务能力、加强行业监管的重要手段。文章综述国内外医院绩效评价现况,针对国内公立医院绩效评价指标体系缺乏可比性、覆盖面窄、评价机制不健全、数据分析不深入等问题,提出加强基于DRGs(疾病诊断相关组)的公立医院绩效评价研究,建立政府主导、社会多元参与的评价机制和评价指标的动态调整机制,健全信息支撑平台,加强数据分析的对策建议。 Performance evaluation is one of the most important tasks of hospital management and an impor-tant means to improve not only the capability of hospital services but also the supervision of the government. This paper reviews the current situation of hospital performance evaluation system both at home and abroad. In order to solve the problems existing in the current hospital performance evaluation system in China, including limited com-parability, low coverage and unsound mechanism, this paper proposes that research on performance evaluation of public hospitals based on DRGs should be strengthened by establishing a dynamic regulation system of government -led and widely engaged evaluation mechanism and index, perfecting information support platform and enhancing data analysis.
作者 陈丽红 吴骋 郭轶斌 贺佳 CHEN Lihong1,2,WU Chen1,GUO Yibin1,HE Jia1(1. Department of Health Statistics, Faculty of Military Health Service, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433;2. Office of Hospital Manage-ment, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20002)
出处 《解放军医院管理杂志》 2018年第3期215-217,共3页 Hospital Administration Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
基金 上海市循证公共卫生与卫生经济学重点学科建设项目(15GWZK0901)
关键词 绩效评价 公立医院 performance evaluation public hospital
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献38

  • 1杨帆,秦银河,董军.国外医疗质量评价的实施与思考[J].中国医院,2005,9(1):73-75. 被引量:2
  • 2郭富威,任苒.DRGs在美国的发展及在我国的应用对策[J].中国医院管理,2006,26(2):32-35. 被引量:76
  • 3卫生部,国家中医药管理局,财政部,等.关于医疗机构分类管理的实施意见(国办发[2000]16号)[EB/OL].[2009-08-10].http://www.moh.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/mohyzs/s3577/200804/18717.htm.
  • 4WHO. The world health report 2000 - Health systems: improving performance. Geneva, 2000: 21-44.
  • 5Kruk ME, Freedman LP. Assessing health system performance in developing countries: A review of the literature. Health Policy, 2007: 2-4.
  • 6National Health Performance Committee. National Report on Health Sector Performance Indicators 2001. http://www.health.qld.gov.au/nathlthrpt/performance.asp.
  • 7Productivity Commission, Public and Private Hospitals, Research Report 2009, Canberra, 2009: 253-261.
  • 8COAG Reform Council, National Healthcare Agreement: Performance report for 2009-10, COAG Reform Council, Sydney, 2009: 49-60.
  • 9Productivity Commission. Report on Government Service Provision 1995-2012. 2012. http://www.pc.gov.au/gsp/rogs.
  • 10National Health Performance Committee. Fourth National Report on Health Sector Performance Indicators – A Report to the Australian Health Ministers’ Conference. 2000. http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/pubs/2000/fourthnationalreport.html.

共引文献153

同被引文献69

引证文献4

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部