期刊文献+

中文版产前检查量表的信度与效度 被引量:1

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Antenatal Examination Scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:翻译引进产前检查量表(Antenatal Care Scale,ANCS),并验证其信度和效度。方法:采用比利时林的跨文化翻译原则对英文版ANCS进行汉化,应用汉化版量表对152名孕妇进行调查,分析其信度和效度。结果:中文版ANCS保留英文版量表的所有26项条目,其条目水平的内容效度(Item-level Content Validity Index,I-CVI)为0.857~1.000,量表水平的内容效度(Scale-level Content Validit y Index,S-CVI)为0.962;通过探索性因子分析可提取意向、主观规范、规范信念、行为态度、行为信念和感知行为控制6个维度,累计贡献率为74.8%;量表各维度与总量表的相关系数为0.634~0.801(P<0.01),各维度相互之间的相关系数为0.306~0.535(P<0.01);量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.882,重测相关系数为0.812。结论:中文版ANCS具有良好的信度和效度,适用于国内孕妇对产前检查态度与行为的评价。 Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of the Antenatal Care Scale(ANCS). Methods: The ANCS was translated into Chinese by Blislin trans cultural translation principle, and 152 Chinese pregnant women were investigated by using the Chinese version ANCS. Results: The Chinese version of ANCS retained English version of all 26 items, the Item-level Content Validity Index(I-CVI) was 0.857–1.000, the Scale-level Content Validity Index(S-CVI) was 0.962; through the exploratory factor analysis can extract the intention, subjective norm, normative beliefs, attitudes, beliefs and behavior perceived behavioral control in six dimensions, the cumulative contribution rate was 74.8%; all the dimensions and total scale correlation coefficient was 0.634–0.801(P〈0.01), each dimension between the correlation coefficient was 0.306–0.535(P〈0.01); the Cronbach's α was 0.882, the retest coefficient was 0.812. Conclusion: The Chinese version of ANCS has good reliability and validity, and is suitable for the evaluation of the attitude and behavior of prenatal care for pregnant women in China.
作者 李少平 任艳芳 秦海霞 崔静静 LI Shaoping1, REN Yanfang2, QIN Haixia1, CUI Jingjing1(1. Department of Gynecology; 2. Department of Obstetrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical College, Weihui Henan 453100, Chin)
出处 《临床与病理杂志》 2018年第2期348-354,共7页 Journal of Clinical and Pathological Research
关键词 孕妇 产前检查 态度 行为 信度 效度 pregnant women prenatal examination attitude behavior reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献82

  • 1赵凤敏,郭素芳,张彤,李伯华,吴匡时,崔颖.不同时期育龄妇女产前保健及影响因素分析[J].中国公共卫生,2006,22(1):9-11. 被引量:39
  • 2张连生,赵艳霞,崔丹,杜玉开.当前我国社区妇幼保健服务现状和建议[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(12):1586-1589. 被引量:26
  • 3贾延军,薛玲,庞淑兰,苏建强,徐强(编校).孕妇孕产期保健需求调查分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(16):2268-2269. 被引量:18
  • 4Polit, DF, Beck, CT. the content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations[J]. Research in Nursing& Health, 2006,29,489-497.
  • 5Lynn . MR Determination and quantification of content validify [J]. Nursing Research, 1986,35(6) :382-385.
  • 6Davis, LL. 1992. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts[J]. Applied Nursing Research, 1992, 5(4): 194-197.
  • 7Polit, DF, Beck, CT, Owen, SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations [J]. Research in Nursing &Health, 2007,30,459-467.
  • 8Grant, JS, Davis, LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development[J]. Research in Nursing & Health, 1997, 20, 269-274.
  • 9Waltz, CF. Strickland, O. , & Lenz, E. Measurement in nursing and health research[M]. 3rd ed. 2005. New York: Springer Publishing Co. 20-69.
  • 10Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.

共引文献1679

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部