摘要
新古典经济学认为环境规制导致了企业成本增加,而"波特假说"认为设置合理的环境规制政策可以刺激企业产生补偿生态创新行为、提高企业绩效,使企业获得竞争优势。基于"波特假说"与新古典经济学派观点的冲突,本文利用我国沪深两市42家矿产资源上市公司2010-2015年的3024个面板数据,实证分析环境规制、生态创新和企业竞争力之间的关系。结果表明:在短期内,环境规制对企业进行生态创新有激励作用;企业进行生态创新可以提升企业竞争力,环境规制与生态创新可以促进企业竞争力的提升,但环境规制对企业竞争力的影响存在一定的滞后效应。上述结论为我国企业实现生态创新与企业竞争力提升的双重目标提供了借鉴与参考,对于我国政府部门制定有效的环境规制政策提供了理论依据。
The traditional view of New Classical Economics is that environmental regulation will lead to the increase of the cost of enterprises, but ＂Porter Hypothesis＂ considers that a reasonable set of environmental regulation policy can stimulate the enterprises to carry out ecological innovation, generate innovation compensation effect, improve enterprise performance, so as to make the enterprises gain competitive advantages. Based on the conflict between ＂Porter Hypothesis＂ and the New Classical Economics, this paper uses 3024 panel data of 42 mineral resources listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2010 to 2015 and conducts the empirical research on the relationship among environmental regulation, ecological innovation and enterprise competitiveness. The results show that environmental regu- lation has incentive effects on the ecological innovation of enterprises in the short term ; enterprises with ecological innovation can promote the competitiveness, and ecological innovation can promote the enterprise competitiveness, but the influence of environmental regulation has lag effect. The above conclusions will provide reference for the promotion of ecological innovation and enterprise competitiveness, and provide the theoretical basis for the government departments to formulate effective environmental regulation policies.
作者
何玉梅
罗巧
朱筱薇
HE Yu-mei;LUO Qiao;ZHU Xiao-wei(School of Business, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)
出处
《商业研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第3期132-137,共6页
Commercial Research
基金
四川省社会科学重点研究基地系统科学与企业发展研究中心项目"环境规制
生态创新对企业竞争力的影响研究"
项目编号:Xq16C11
四川省科技计划项目
项目编号:2017ZR0121
四川省省属高校科研创新团队建设计划
项目编号:18TD0016
关键词
环境规制
生态创新
企业竞争力
波特假说
environmental regulation
ecological innovation
enterprise competitiveness
Potter Hypothesis
