摘要
目的构建广东省基本公共卫生服务项目绩效评价指标体系,为开展绩效评价提供有效工具。方法通过文献资料分析方法初步拟定指标体系,采用德尔菲法通过2轮专家函询进行指标的筛选,采用百分位法和乘积法计算一、二、三级指标的相对权重。结果第1轮专家咨询参与调查的专家共25人,其中从事公共卫生管理的17人(占68.0%),本科及以上学历的22人(占88.0%),副高及以上职称的16人(占64.0%);第2轮专家共22人,其中从事公共卫生管理的17人(占77.3%),本科及以上学历的20人(占90.9%),副高及以上职称的15人(占68.1%)。2轮咨询专家的积极系数分别为83.3%和88.0%,专家判断依据平均得分为0.813分,熟悉程度平均得分为0.805分,专家的权威程度为0.781分。经过2轮咨询最终确立的广东省基本公共卫生服务项目绩效评价指标体系包括组织管理、资金管理、项目执行、项目效果、公众知晓率和满意度5项一级指标、25项二级指标和41项三级指标。结论本研究建立的评价指标体系专家意见的协调程度、权威程度均较高,该指标体系可用于广东省基本公共卫生服务项目绩效评价。
Objective To develop an evaluation index system for projects of essential public health service in Guangdong Province so as to provide an effective tool for performance evaluation. Methods An index system was preliminarily established using the literature analysis, and the relative weights of the first, second and tertiary indexes were calculated by using the percentile method and the product meth- od through two rounds of expert letters. Results Twenty-five experts conducted the first round of expert consultation survey. Of all the experts, 17（68.0% ） were engaged in the management of public health, 22 （88 0% ） had bachelor degrees or above, and 16（64.0% ） had senior or associate-senior professional ti- ties. There were 22 experts in the second round of expert consultation. Of them, 17 （77.3%） experts were engaged in the management of public health, 20 （90.9%） had bachelor degrees or above, 15 （68.1% ） had senior or associate-senior professional titles. The positive coefficients of two rounds of con- suiting experts were 83.3% and 88.0% , respectively. The average score of expert judgment was 0. 813, the average degree of familiarity was 0. 805, and the degree of the expert authority was 0.781. After two rounds of consultations, the performance evaluation index system of essential public health service projects in Guangdong Province was established, including the organization and management, fund management,project implementation, project effect, public awareness and satisfaction with 5 primary indexes, 25 sec- ondary indexes, and 41 tertiary indexes. Conclusion The evaluation index system was established in the study with high degrees of coordination and authority of the expert opinions, and can be used to evaluate the performance of essential public health service projects in Guangdong Province.
作者
蔡荟
何艳辉
夏英华
曹蓉
郝爱华
张容瑜
何群
CAI Hui;HE Yan-hui;XIA Ying-hua;CAO Rong;HAO Ai-hua;ZHANG Rong-yu;HE Qun.(Guangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511430, China)
出处
《华南预防医学》
2018年第2期122-127,共6页
South China Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金
广东省医学科研基金项目(WSTJJ20140120445221198212031040)
广东省科技计划项目(2015A030401056)
关键词
基本公共卫生服务
德尔菲法
评价研究
Essential public health service
Delphi method
Performance evaluation
