期刊文献+

利用6σ质量标准对急诊实验室8台仪器的检测性能进行综合评价及质量改进 被引量:2

Overall Evaluation and Management of 8 Instruments in Emergency Laboratory Using 6σ Quality Standard
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的利用6σ质量标准对急诊实验室8台仪器的检测性能进行综合评价并督促实验室持续质量改进。方法选择8台仪器的46个检测项目为实验指标,以2017年上半年为质量改进前,下半年为质量改进后,收集8台仪器改进前的室间质量评价回报的偏倚和相应月份的室内质量控制的变异系数,以CLIA’88允许总误差为质量目标,按公式计算出σ值,从而综合评价8台仪器的检测性能。通过计算质量目标指数(QGI)值,找出问题所在,并从"人、机、料、环、法"方面下手,进行质量改进。之后收集改进后的室间质量评价回报的偏倚及相应月份的室内质量控制的变异系数,再次算出σ值,从而验证改进效果。结果 46个检测项目,质量改进前达到6σ以上的有27项,占58.7%;5σ以上的有30项,占65.2%;4σ以上的有35项,占76.1%;3σ以上的有41项,占89.1%;2~3σ的有5项,占10.9%。通过计算QGI值得知,需要改进精密度的有8项,需要改进准确度的有8项,需要改进精密度和准确度的有3项。改进后,除了NT-proBNP卫生部无第二次室间质评外,余45项,能够达到6σ以上的有34项,占75.6%;5σ以上的有38项,占84.4%;4σ以上的有40项,占88.9%;3σ以上的有44项,占97.8%;2~3σ的有1项,占2.2%。各阶段的σ值数量明显提高,质量改进已初见成效。结论用6σ质量标准对仪器性能的综合评价能够促进实验室持续质量改进,能够为临床提供一份精准的检验报告,进而减少危急值的复检率,缩短报告的周转时间,大大提升了临床和患者的满意度。 Objective To evaluate and improve overall quality detection of 8 instruments in emergency laboratory using 6σ quality standard.Methods In 2017,collected both internal quality control(IQC)and external quality assessment(EQA)data of 46 assay items from 8 instruments in their laboratory,and then calculated theirσ values and total allowed errors according to CLIA'88 standards.By comparison of their quality goal index(QGI)between first and second half year of 2017,successfully elevated assayquality using strategy(man,machine,material,method,measurment and enviroment).ResultsFor all 46 assay items(except NT-proBNP without second EQA data),made better improvement of detection of 34(75.6%of 6σ qualified),38(84.4% of 5σ qualified),40(88.9% of 4σ qualified),44(97.8% of 3σ qualified)and 1(2.2% of 2~3σ qualified)items,respectively whereas there were 27(58.7% of 6σ qualified),30(65.2% of 5σ qualified),35(76.1% of 4σ qualified),41(89.1% of 3σ qualified)and 5(10.9% of 2~3σ qualified)items before improvement.Conclusion Using 6σ quality standard,could make more progress in the laboratory for many respects:fast and accurate clinical reports,reducing reinspection rate,and increasing patient's satisfactory,etc.
作者 史光华 刘连义 张庆 刘艳丽 安冉 刘鹏宇 姜慧英 SHI Guang-hua;LIU Lian-yi;ZHANG Qing;LIU Yan-li;AN Ran;LIU Peng-yu;JIANG Hui-ying(Department of Clinical Laboratory, General Hospital of Beijing Coal Group, Beijing 102300, China)
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2018年第2期146-150,共5页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
关键词 6σ质量标准 性能 质量改进 6σ quality standard performance quality improvement
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献67

  • 1陈文祥,申子瑜,杨振华.临床检验分析质量指标的设定[J].中华检验医学杂志,2006,29(4):298-300. 被引量:51
  • 2毕波,吕元.定量检测方法学性能验证的系统设计[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(2):143-145. 被引量:153
  • 3李园园,李萍,黄亨建.应用六西格玛理论评价临床实验室检验性能及设计质控方案[J].中国医疗器械信息,2007,13(6):9-11. 被引量:36
  • 4Petersen PH, de Verdier CH, Groth T, et al. Clinically based quality goals : a NORDKEM project[J]. Eur J Haematol Suppl, 1990,45(53) : 6-8.
  • 5Kallner A, McQueen M, Heuck C. The Stockholm Consensus Conference on quality specifications in laboratory medicine, 25-26 April 1999 [J]. Scand J Clin Lab Invest,1999,59(7) :475-476.
  • 6Fraser CG, Petersen PH, Ricos C, et al. Proposed quality specifications for the imprecision and inaccuracy of analytical systems for clinical chemistry[J]. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem,1992,30(5) :311-317.
  • 7Fraser CG, Hyltoft Petersen P, Libeer JC,et al. Proposals for setting generally applicable quality goals solely based on biology[J]. Ann Clin Biochem, 1997, 34(Pt 1) :8-12.
  • 8Westgard JO,Stein B. Automated selection of statistical quality-control procedures to assure meeting clinical or analytical quality requirements[J]. Clin Chem, 1997,43(2) :400-403.
  • 9中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS-CL38医学实验室质量和能力认可准则在临床化学检验领域的应用说明[S].北京:中国合格评定国家认可委员会,2012.
  • 10Toll AD, liu JM,Gulati G, et al. Does routine repeat testing o critical values offer any advantage over single testing[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med,20l1,135(4) :440-444.

共引文献89

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部