摘要
新司改下,利用审前程序分流案件并实现案件的集中审理是应对案多人少的有利举措,但这有待于激活新举证时限制度。通过实例检视,司法解释确立的新举证时限制度已名存实亡。最高院规避司法责任的利己需求和顾虑是多余的,法官依法适用证据失权并不构成错案。为了实现集中审理,德、日、美皆将诉讼迟延作为适用证据失权的考量因素,通过增加证据失权的适用空间来践行适时提出主义,从而确保举证时限的震慑力。矫正并激活新举证时限制度应将诉讼迟延纳入证据失权的考量范围并细化罚款的规定。
Under the new judicial reform, the using of pretrial procedures to divert cases and achieve cen- tralized trial of cases is an advantageous measure to deal with many cases, but it still needs to activate the new time limitation of evidence submission. Through the examination of real cases, we can find that the new time limitation of evidence submission is null and void. It is unnecessary for the Supreme Court to avoid judicial responsibility be- cause the judge applying the loss of evidence according to law does not constitute misjudged case. In order to a- chieve the centralized trial, although having different structure of civil procedure, Germany, Japan and the United States all take litigation delay into consideration for the loss of evidence, and then through increasing the applica- tion of space to the loss of evidence. In response to the new reform needs, and also in order to adapt to the world trend of centralized trial, it is necessary and meaningful to increase the space of loss of evidence and improve the fine refinement to correct new time limitation of evidence submission, which activates new time limitation of evi- dence submission
作者
隋璐明
Sui Lu - ming(School of Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)
出处
《政法学刊》
2018年第1期88-98,共11页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
新司改
实例检视
新举证时限制度
证据失权
new judicial reform
case inspection
new time limitation of evidence submission
loss of evi-dence
litigation delay
