期刊文献+

颈干角和前倾角变化对髋关节应力分布影响 被引量:3

Effects of femoral neck angle and anteversion on stress distribution in hip joint
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文建立了不同颈干角和前倾角的置换后有骨盆髋关节模型,通过数值模拟分析了颈干角和前倾角的变化对置换后髋关节各部分应力分布规律的影响.通过对不同颈干角和前倾角的髋关节模型进行数值模拟,发现随着髋关节模型颈干角和前倾角的改变,股骨和假体柄上的最大应力值及位置也会随之改变且呈现一定的规律性,说明颈干角和前倾角也是影响髋关节应力分布及应力值大小的重要因素. The models of hip joint after replacement established with pelvic and different femoral neck angles and anteversions were to analyze the laws of stress distribution by numerical simulation. It could be found that with the femoral neck angle and anteversion changes,the maximum stress value and position on the femur and prosthesis changed as well and show regularity. It demonstrated that the femoral neck angle and anteversion are also important factors to the stress value and stress distribution on the hip joint.
作者 曹照华 董黎敏 叶金铎 刘念 陈伟 CAO Zhao-hua;DONG Lin-min;YE Jin-duo;LIU Nian;CHEN Wei(School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Key Laboratory for Advacced Mechatronie Design and Intelligent Control National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Education, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China;Tianjin Just Huajian Medical Instrument Co., Ltd, Tianjin 300113, China)
出处 《天津理工大学学报》 2018年第2期12-17,共6页 Journal of Tianjin University of Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(11372221) 天津市科技特派员项目(16JCTPJC49900)
关键词 颈干角 前倾角 数值模拟 应力分布 femoral neck angle femoral anteversion numerical simulation stress distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献65

  • 1刘勤,王慧娟,李秀平,吴小燕,聂小芳.中国人股骨近端参数统计[J].解剖与临床,2005,10(1):25-27. 被引量:23
  • 2张美超,史风雷,赵卫东,欧阳钧,钟世镇.髋关节外展不同角度股骨颈应力分布的有限元分析[J].第一军医大学学报,2005,25(10):1244-1246. 被引量:23
  • 3赵新华,严世贵.股骨颈骨折不愈合治疗进展[J].国际骨科学杂志,2006,27(5):277-280. 被引量:2
  • 4Lewis CL, Sahrmann SA, Moran DW. Effect of position and alteration in synergist muscle force contribution on hip forces when performing hip strengthening exercises. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2009;24(1):35-42.
  • 5Qian JG, Song YW, Tang X, et al. Examination of femoral-neck structure using finite element model and bone density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Clin Biomech 2009; 24( 1): 47-52.
  • 6Jonkers I,- Sauwen N, Lenaerts G, et al. Relation between subject-specific hip joint loading, stress distribution in the proximal femur and bone mineral density changes after total hip replacement. J Biomech 2008; 41(16): 3405-3413.
  • 7Chen HZ, Jiang W, Zou W, et al. The biomechanical behavior on the interface of tumor arthrosis/allograft prosthetic composite by finite element analysis. Appl Surf Sci 2008; 255(2): 276-278.
  • 8Shen GS, Xu YJ, Zhou HB, et al. Effect of femoral tunnel angle on tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. The Seventh Asian-Pacific Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering, 2008, Beijing, China. IFMBE Proc 2008;19:103-106.
  • 9Completo A, Talaia P, Fonseca F, et al. Relationship of design features of stemmed tibial knee prosthesis with stress shielding and end-of-stem pain. Mater Design 2009; 30(4): 1391-1397.
  • 10El'Sheikh HE MacDonald B J, Hashmi MSJ. Finite element simulation of the hip joint during stumbling: A comparison between static and dynamic loading. J Mater Proc Techn 2003; 143/144(1): 249-255.

共引文献92

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部