期刊文献+

维生素C片3种含量测定方法的比较 被引量:10

Comparison of three methods for determination of Vitamin C tablets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较高效液相色谱法、紫外分光光度法和碘量法测定维生素C片含量的可靠性和准确性。方法:参照《中国药典》2015年版及相关文献分别采用高效液相色谱法、紫外-可见光分光光度法、碘量法对维生素C片中维生素C的含量进行测定。结果:高效液相色谱法的含量测定结果为标示量的98.7%~102.4%;紫外-可见光分光光度法的含量测定结果为标示量98.7%~102.1%;碘量法的含量测定结果为标示量98.6%~100.5%,三种方法的含量测定结果均符合2015年版《中国药典》93.0%~107.0%的规定。结论:三种方法的含量测定结果没有显著差异,均可以用于维生素C片质量控制。 Objective: To compare the reliability and accuracy of High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) , UV-Vis Spectrophotometry and iodometry to determine the content of Vitamin C in Vitamin C tablets. Methods: Referring to Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2015 and literatures,the content of Vitamin C in Vitamin C tablets was determined by HPLC, UV-Vis Spectrophotometry and iodimetry. Results:The test results by HPLC fell into 98.7% to 102. 4%, the test results by UV-Vis Spectrophotometry fell into 98.7% to 102. 1%, and the test results of iodometry fell into 98.6% to 100. 5%. The test results by these three methods met the criteria of 93.0% to 107.0% in Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2015. Conclusion:There is no significant difference between the test results of these three methods. These three methods can be used to the quality control of Vitamin C tablets.
作者 贺澎 王文丽 HE Peng;WANG Wenli(Guilin Institute for Drug and Food Control, Guilin 541012, China;Guilin People's Hospital, Guilin 541002, China)
出处 《中国药品标准》 CAS 2018年第2期112-114,共3页 Drug Standards of China
关键词 维生素C片 高效液相色谱法 紫外.可见光分光光度法 碘量法 Vitamin C tablet HPLC UV-Vis spectrophotometry iodometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献2

  • 1.中国药典:二部[M].,2005.580.
  • 2刘文英.药物分析.第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.225.

共引文献5

同被引文献87

引证文献10

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部