摘要
文章旨在对比中国、美国及欧洲排名前列的土木工程专业高校在本科教学课程设置中的差异,统计了2014-2015年网络上公开的中国、美国和欧洲共26所排名前列的土木工程专业高校的教学计划和课程设置情况,进行了总学时数、课程结构、通识课程以及实践教学四个方面的对比分析。通过数据分析发现,中国各高校提倡文理结合的通才教育,美国各高校则相对注重通识教育课程的教学,而欧洲各高校比较重视本科阶段的专业课程教学。关于实践教学环节,中国高校主要是安排学生进行实习和课程实验,而美国和欧洲高校往往倾向于采用更加紧密的学校与企业合作办学的形式。
The purpose of this paper is to draw instructive conclusions by analyzing differences between Chinese and foreign universities on civil engineering undergraduate education. Teaching methods were taken into consideration. Statistical data for 2014—2015 years on the Internet of 26 famous universities in China, USA and Europe were collected. After comparing differences of civil engineering curriculums from selected colleges, four aspects were analyzed such as the total number of teaching hours, course structure, general education curriculum and practical teaching. It is obvious that the combination of arts and liberal education are advocated in Chinese universities, and specialized courses are taken seriously in Europe universities while general education lessons are valued in American universities. There are also many differences among universities in three regions when referring to approaches of practical teaching. Chinese universities are mainly arranged for students to take internships and curriculum experiments, while American and European universities tend to adopt more closely in the form of school and enterprise cooperation in running schools.
作者
李林瑾
周云
曾雅丽思
张军凯
LI Linjin;ZHOUYun;ZENGYalisi;ZHANGJunkai(Hunan Communication Polytechnic, Changsha 410132, P. R. China;School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P. R. China)
出处
《高等建筑教育》
2018年第2期41-47,共7页
Journal of Architectural Education in Institutions of Higher Learning
基金
中国教育部"卓越工程师教育培养计划"的资助
关键词
土木工程
本科教学
课程分析
通识教育
实践教学
civil engineering
undergraduate teaching
curriculum comparison
general education
practical teaching
