摘要
优先提升信息技术促进更高层次的教育公平是教育信息化发展的新使命。通过对我国20余年来教育信息化帮扶政策的梳理和分析发现,人们对教育公平的诉求正由起点公平转向过程公平、由量性公平转向质性公平;在分析"互联网+"教育内涵基础上,提出了包含"起点、参与、过程、差异、评价"维度的多元教育公平分析框架,用以阐述更高层次教育公平新内涵,并揭示"互联网+"教育精准帮扶推进路径由物理接入迈向深度应用和融合创新的转移逻辑。相应地,在帮扶政策的价值选择上建议:建立帮扶目标与多元公平的层次匹配关系以靶向精准;置教师于直接帮扶对象以解决内生发展问题;跨越经济贫困视野以消弭新的数字鸿沟;构建能体现多元教育公平观的帮扶绩效评价体系等。
Giving priority to utilizing ICT to promote higher level of education equity is a new mission of educational informatization. The paper has analyzed the assistance policy of educational informatization in China in the past 20 years and finds that people＇s appeal to education equity has been shifting from the jumping-off point equality to process equality, and from quantity equality to quality equality. This paper proposes an analytical framework of multiple education equity based on the analysis of the features of Internet ＋ education, which is composed of five dimensions, namely starting point, participation, process,differences and evaluation. This framework helps to expound the new features of higher level of education equity and reveal the transition logic of precise assistance route of Internet ＋ education from physical access to deep application and integration innovation. Accordingly, when it comes to the value choice of assistance policy, it is suggested that establishing a matching relationship between the supporting goals and the multi-level equality to target precisely; helping teachers directly to solve the problem of endogenous development; bridging the new digital gap across economic poverty; constructing a performance evaluation system that can reflect the multiple education equity.
作者
廖宏建
张倩苇
LIAO Hongjian;ZHANG Qianwei(School of Information Technology in Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510631)
出处
《电化教育研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第5期5-11,共7页
E-education Research
基金
2017年广东省高校特色创新类教育科研课题"‘互联网+’教育精准帮扶研究"
2017年广东省本科高等教育教学改革项目"高校教师SPOC混合教学胜任力模型构建及培训应用"(项目编号:2017443)
关键词
教育精准帮扶
“互联网+”教育
多元教育公平
路径与政策
Educational Precise Assistance
Internet＋Education
Multiple Educational Equity
Path and Policy
