摘要
在历史人类学的学术实践中存在着历史学学科本位的历史人类学和人类学学科本位的历史人类学,本文把基于两种学科传统形成的历史人类学研究归纳为"在历史中寻找文化"和"在文化中寻找历史"两种不同的研究路径。在中国的历史人类学研究中,因为大量成文史料的存在,"在历史中寻找文化"的研究路径较为容易,因此形成了中国历史人类学研究的"华南学派"。同样是因为大量成文史料的存在,"在文化中寻找历史"的研究路径面临着诸多实践上的困难。文章认为,一项真正的历史人类学研究应该是历史和文化两个概念互相嵌入,而不是文化点缀历史或是将历史塞进文化之中。
In the academic practice, historical anthropology has both history-based and anthro原pology-based dimensions. Based on these two kinds of practice, this article summarizes the historicalanthropological research into two different research paths as“looking for culture in history”and“searching for history in culture”. In the study of historical anthropology in China, because of theabundance of written historical materials, the first kind of research path is relatively easy, thus form原ing the“South China School”of Chinese historical anthropology. Also because of the existence ofalarge amount of written historical materials, the second research path faces many practical difficulties.The paper argues that a true historical anthropological study should embody both history and cul原ture, rather than make culture an embellishment of history or stuff history in culture.
出处
《广西民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期112-119,共8页
GUANGXI ETHNIC STUDIES
基金
南岭走廊族群文化研究基地项目"房族.村落.社会:以清水江下游加池苗寨的考察为中心"(2016kf12)
关键词
历史
文化
互相嵌入
历史性
history
culture
mutual embedment
historicity