摘要
[目的/意义]学者学术影响力评价备受学术界的高度关注,如何科学选取评价学者学术影响力的指标是很多学者关注的焦点。[方法/过程]采用p指数的提出者Prathap为弥补p指数不能体现总量相等的引文数在单篇论文上的分布情况的缺陷,新提出的z指数,以Muscular Dystrophy研究领域最具代表性的15位学者为例,计算目标数据的z指数、h指数、p指数、总发文量、总被引次数和平均被引率、体现引文分布的一致性指标η,实证分析了利用z指数评价学者学术影响力的效果。[结果/结论]z指数优于现有的h指数和p指数,更具有评价的全面性和合理性,可以进一步扩大范围使用。
[Purpose/significance] The evaluation of academic influence of researchers is highly valued in the academic field. The focus of attention is how to choose evaluation index rationally and scientifically. [Method/process] This paper adopts zindex to evaluate researchers＇ academic influence,which is proposed by Prathap in order to deal with the problem that p-index isn＇t sensitive to the concentration degree of the total citations in a few highly cited papers. Taking 15 researchers in the field of Muscular Dystrophy as examples,the paper calculates their z-index,h-index,p-index,total number of articles,total citation frequencies,the average citation frequency rate,and the consistency of citation distribution η. An empirical study is conducted to analyze the effect of z-index in the evaluation of academic influence of researchers. [Result/conclusion] The conclusion is that z-index is more comprehensive and reasonable than h-index and p-index,and it can be used in more fields.
出处
《情报理论与实践》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第5期50-54,共5页
Information Studies:Theory & Application
基金
家社会科学基金项目"中国与‘一带一路’沿线国家图书馆国际合作项目评价及质量提升策略研究"(项目编号:17BTQ022)
四川大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目"SSCI收录我国社会科学文献的特征分析及动态评价模型研究"(项目编号:skzx2015-sb51)
四川大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目"人文社科类期刊学术质量评价体系创新研究"(项目编号:skqy201519)的成果
关键词
Z指数
p指数
引文分布
学术影响力
评价
z-index
p-index
citation distribution
academic influence
evaluation
