期刊文献+

钙钠磷硅酸和硝酸钾牙膏抗牙本质敏感效果的系统评价和Meta分析 被引量:3

Effect of calcium sodium phosphosilicate and potassium nitrate on dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价钙钠磷硅酸(CSPS)与硝酸钾牙膏抗牙本质敏感效果的临床疗效。方法计算机检索The Cochrane Library(2017年6期)、Pub Med、Embase、Wan Fang Data、CBM和CNKI数据库,查找CSPS与硝酸钾牙膏对牙本质敏感症状疗效的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时限均为从建库至2017年6月。由2名评价员独立筛选文献、提取资料和评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用Rev Man 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入8个RCT,包括411例患者,其中试验组203例,对照组208例。Meta分析结果显示:试验组2、4、6、8周吹气敏感值优于对照组[SMD=-1.85,95%CI(-2.89,-0.81),P=0.000 5,I2=93%],[SMD=-1.61,95%CI(-1.96,-1.26),P<0.000 01,I2=49%],[SMD=-3.79,95%CI(-7.18,-0.40),P=0.03,I2=98%],[SMD=-2.13,95%CI(-2.69,-1.58),P<0.000 01]。试验组12周吹气敏感值与对照组差异无统计学意义[SMD=-0.63,95%CI(-1.47,0.20),P=0.14,I2=71%]。试验组2、4、6、8、12周冷水刺激敏感值优于对照组[SMD=-1.07,95%CI(-1.48,-0.66),P<0.000 01,I2=69%],[SMD=-1.29,95%CI(-1.81,-0.76),P<0.000 01,I2=64%],[SMD=-1.20,95%CI(-1.57,-0.83),P<0.000 01,I2=86%],[SMD=-1.30,95%CI(-2.51,-0.08),P=0.04,I2=82%],[SMD=-0.79,95%CI(-1.27,-0.31),P=0.001]。试验组1周冷水刺激敏感值与对照组差异无统计学意义[SMD=0.00,95%CI(-0.62,0.62),P=1]。试验组2、4、8周探诊敏感值优于对照组[SMD=-1.31,95%CI(-2.00,-0.62),P=0.000 2,I2=67%],[SMD=-1.37,95%CI(-1.74,-0.99),P<0.000 01,I2=23%],[SMD=-1.33,95%CI(-1.82,-0.84),P<0.000 01]。试验组1周探诊敏感值与对照组差异无统计学意义[SMD=-0.32,95%CI(-0.94,0.31),P=0.32]。结论 CSPS比硝酸钾牙膏更有效地降低牙本质敏感。受纳入研究的数量和质量限制,上述结论尚需更多高质量、大样本RCT予以验证。 Objective This systematic review and Meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of calcium sodium phosphosilicate (CSPS) and potassium nitrate as desensitizing agents for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH). Methods A thorough search in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Chinese WanFang Data, CBM, and CNKI were conducted for studies published up to June 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the treatment of DH with CSPS and potassium nitrate toothpaste were included. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently,and Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Eight RCTs involving 411 patients were included. Experimental group comprised 203 and control group had 208 patients. The Meta-analysis indicated the superior effect of CSPS dentifrice on air blast sensitivity at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks of follow-up [SMD=-1.85, 95%CI (-2.89,-0.81), P=-0.000 5,I^2=93%], [SMD=-1.61, 95%CI (-1.96,-1.26), P〈0.000 01,I^2=49%], [SMD=-3.79, 95%CI (-7.18,-0.40), P=0.03, I^2=98%], and [SMD=-2.13, 95%CI (-2.69,-1.58), P〈0.000 01] , respectively. No significant effects were seen at 12 weeks [SMD=-0.63, 95%CI (-1.47, 0.20), P=-0.14, I^2=71%]. CSPS dentifrice showed a better desensitizing effect at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks of follow-up on cold water sensitivity [SMD=-1.07, 95%CI (-1.48,-0.66), P〈0.000 01,I^2=69%], [SMD=-1.29, 95%CI (-1.81,-0.76), P〈0.000 01,I^2=64%], [SMD=-1.20, 95%CI (-1.57,-0.83), P〈0.000 01,I^2=86%], [SMD=-1.30, 95%CI (-2.51,-0.08), P=0.04, I^2=82%], and [SMD=-0.79, 95%CI (-1.27,-0.31), P=0.001], respectively. No significant effects at 1 week of follow-up [SMD=0.00, 95%CI (-0.62, 0.62), P=1]. The favorable effect of CSPS dentifrice on tactile sensitivity was more obvious than the control group at 2, 4, and 8 weeks of follow-up [SMD=-1.31, 95%CI (-2.00,-0.62), P=0.000 2,I^2=67%], [SMD=-1.37, 95%CI (-1.74,-0.99), P〈0.000 01,I^2=23%]; and [SMD=-1.33, 95%CI (-1.82,-0.84), P〈0.000 01], respectively. No significant effects at 1 week of follow-up [SMD=-0.32, 95%CI (-0.94, 0.31), P=0.32] were observed. Conclusion Current evidence indicated that CSPS was more effective than potassium nitrate at reducing DH. The evidence generated by this review was based on a small number of individuals. High-quality and large sample size as well as ideally-designed clinical trials are required in the future before definitive recommendations can be made.
作者 刘媛 吴龙 孟凡琦 侯鑫山 赵今 Liu Yuan;Wu Long;Meng Fanqi;Hou Xinshan;Zhao Jin(Dept. of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China;Xinjiang Oral Medical Research Institute, Urumqi 830054, China)
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期301-307,共7页 West China Journal of Stomatology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81360167)~~
关键词 钙钠磷硅酸 硝酸钾 牙本质敏感 随机对照试验 META分析 系统评价 calcium sodium phosphosilicate potassium nitrate dentin hypersensitivity randomized controlled trial Meta-analysis systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1樊明文,周学东.牙体牙髓病学[M].第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009,5:278-279.
  • 2Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin Hypersensitivity.Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management ofdentin hypersensitivity[J].J Can Dent Assoc,2003,69(4):221-226.
  • 3Holland GR,Narhi MN,Aday M,et a1.Guidelines for the designand conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity[J].JClin Periodontol,1997,24(11):808-813.
  • 4Walters PA.Dentinal hypersensitivity:a review[J].J ContempDent Pract,2005,6(2):107-117.
  • 5Schiff T,Santos MD,Laffi S,et al.Efficacy of a dentifricecontaining 5%potassium nitrate and 1500 ppm sodiummonofluorphosphate in a precipitated calcium carbonate base ondentinal hypersensitivity[J].J Clin Dent,1998,9(1):22-25.
  • 6Wara-aswapati N,Krongnawakul D,Jiraviboon D,et al.Theeffect of a new toothpaste containing potassium nitrate andtriclosan on gingival health,plaque formation and dentinehypersensitivity[J].J Clin Periodontol,2005,32(1):53-58.
  • 7Ezzatollah J,Naghmeh M,Maryan M.A comparison of theefficacy of potassium nitrate and Gluma desensitizer in thereduction of hypersensitivity in teeth with full-crown preparations[J].JContemp Dent Pract,2009,10(1):66-73.
  • 8Sowinski J,Ayad F,Petrone M,et al.Comparative investigationsof the desensitising efficacy of a new dentifrice[J].J ClinPeriodontol,2001,28(11):1032-1036.
  • 9Hoyt WH,Bibby BG.Use of sodium fluoride for desensitizingdentin[J].JADA,1943,30(12):1372-1376.
  • 10Dababneh RH,Khouri AT,Addy M.Dentine hypersensitivity--an enigma?A review of terminology,mechanisms,aetiology andmanagement[J].Br Dent J,1999,187(11):606-611.

共引文献2

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部